Recent animal studies demonstrated neuronal apoptosis following early life exposure to most anesthetic drugs. Further research into this question demonstrated neonatal neuronal damage in multiple species (including primates) and evidence that this damage has cognitive and social sequela. These results raised the suspicion that general anesthesia in neonates, infants and pregnant women may injure the developing brain. Follow-up human studies were inconclusive. Retrospective studies suffer from tremendous selection bias due to the surgical effect and the baseline condition that required the surgical intervention. A number of large retrospective studies yield contradicting results, leaving the issue unsettled. Results of new, high quality prospective studies suggest that a short, single exposure does not lead to any measurable damage, but we are still awaiting final long term results. Despite the inconclusive evidence, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a warning mandating drug manufacturers to disclose the risk with the package insert, and clinicians to discuss the possible risks with the parents or the pregnant woman before the planned procedure. The European Society of Anesthesiologists, as well as the Israeli Society of Anesthesiologists, did not adopt this FDA policy. Despite the possible uncertain risk, it was decided that the evidence is inconclusive in regards to clinical human scenarios. It was agreed that such warnings would lead to delaying necessary procedures based on unfounded information. It was therefore decided to avoid changing the informed consent form and consent process until further information is available.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Background: Perinatal mental health problems, such as anxiety, stress, and depression, warrant particularly close monitoring and intervention, but they are often unaddressed in both obstetric and psychiatric clinics, with limited accessibility and treatment resources. Mobile health interventions may provide an effective and more accessible solution for addressing perinatal mental health. Development and evaluation of a mobile mental health intervention specifically for pregnant women are warranted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
January 2025
Department of Population and Family Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Background: Pregnancy is often seen as a joyful and fulfilling time for many women. However, a significant number of women in Ethiopia experience intimate partner violence (IPV) during this period. Despite this, there is limited evidence on interventions aimed at preventing violence during pregnancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Despite the significant public health burden of maternal mental health disorders in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), limited data are available on their effects on early childhood development (ECD), nutritional status, and child health in the region.
Aims: This study investigated the association between maternal mental health and ECD, nutritional status, and common childhood illnesses, while controlling for biological, social, financial, and health-related factors and/or confounders.
Method: As part of the Innovative Partnership for Universal and Sustainable Healthcare (i-PUSH) program evaluation study, initiated in November 2019, a cohort of low-income rural families, including pregnant women or women of childbearing age with children under five, was recruited for this study.
PeerJ
January 2025
Center of Reproductive Medicine, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Background: Group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth. This meta-analysis investigated the relationship between maternal rectovaginal GBS colonization and the risk of stillbirth.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, covering studies published from the inception of the database until September 9, 2024.
Health SA
December 2024
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Background: Globally, reports have shown that pregnant women refuse to receive the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. This has posed a significant concern given the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Aim: This study aims to explore the current evidence on the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on pregnant women.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!