Purpose: To investigate the influence of interocular suppression and visual acuity loss on stereoacuity in observers with and without abnormal vision development from strabismus or amblyopia. To determine whether stereoacuity improves in amblyopic observers when suppression is neutralized.
Methods: Experiment 1: Visual acuity (VA), depth of suppression (contrast ratio [CR]), and stereoacuity (digital random-dot) were tested in adult amblyopic observers (n = 21; age 27 ± 11 years). Experiment 2: VA, stereoacuity, and CR were measured at baseline and through a series of monocular contrast attenuation and Bangerter filter conditions that degrade visual input in participants with normal binocular vision (n = 19; age 31 ± 13 years). Multiple regression models were used to determine relative contribution of VA and CR to stereoacuity in both groups. Experiment 3: stereoacuity was retested in a subsample of amblyopic observers (n = 7) after contrast reduction of the stimulus presented to dominant eye to neutralize suppression.
Results: In amblyopic observers, stereoacuity significantly correlated with CR (P < 0.001), but not with interocular VA difference (P = 0.863). In participants with normal vision development, stereoacuity, VA, and CR declined with introduction of monocular Bangerter filter (P < 0.001), and stereoacuity reduced with monocular attenuation of stimulus contrast (P < 0.001). Reduction in stereoacuity correlated with both VA decrement and degraded CR. Stereoacuity significantly improved in amblyopic observers when the contrast to the dominant eye was adjusted based on the contrast ratio.
Conclusions: Suppression rather than visual acuity loss limits stereoacuity in observers with abnormal vision development. Stereopsis can be improved when interocular sensory dominance is neutralized.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419721 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.6.50 | DOI Listing |
Am J Transl Res
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Huizhou Third People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University Huizhou 516000, Guangdong, China.
Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of Visual Training System 4 (VTS4) as an adjunctive therapy for patients with refractive amblyopia.
Method: A total of 82 patients with refractive amblyopia (142 eyes) treated at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University, were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the treatment protocol. The control group included 40 patients (68 eyes) who received conventional comprehensive treatment, while the observation group was comprised of 42 patients (74 eyes) treated with VTS4 in addition to conventional therapy.
JMIR Serious Games
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, No.83 Fenyang Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China, 86 021-64377134.
Background: Amblyopia is a common cause of visual impairment in children. Compliance with traditional treatments for amblyopia is challenging due to negative psychosocial impacts. Recent shifts in amblyopia treatment have moved from suppressing the dominant eye to enhancing binocular visual function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
January 2025
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between fixation stability deficits in anisometropic amblyopia and various visual functions, as well as the underlying retinal structure.
Methods: All 164 patients with anisometropic amblyopia were recruited in this cross-sectional study. The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured using the qCSF method, whereas the MP-3 microperimeter was used to assess fixation stability and locate the preferred retinal locus.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill Vision Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
In amblyopia, abnormal binocular interactions lead to an overwhelming dominance of one eye. One mechanism implied in this imbalance is the suppression between the inputs from the two eyes. This interocular suppression involves two components: an overlay suppression and a surround suppression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
January 2025
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B Ketchum University, Fullerton, California, United States.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!