The traditional drug development paradigm, consisting of sequential phases and randomized studies, has been challenged in oncology and hemato-oncology. In the regulatory context, a number of new products have been authorized based on nonrandomized efficacy and safety data. We retrospectively analyzed the European public assessment reports for anticancer treatments authorized between 2010 and 2019 to describe the data behind such approvals. Twenty-two initial marketing authorizations, mainly conditional, were identified. Fifty percent of the products had an orphan indication, and 77% had received previous scientific advice. Conclusions of clinical benefit were based on tumor responses, ranging between 15.8 and 88%. Our data shows that single-arm clinical studies leading to positive regulatory outcomes share common methodological approaches and end points, mostly comparing the overall response rate with a fixed success threshold as the primary analysis. The clinical indications in these approvals are clustered in late-line settings, hematological malignancies, and lung cancer. Our findings underline the need to reflect on the current practice, the methodological aspects, and end points in single-arm studies, and develop specific regulatory guidance on nonrandomized and novel study designs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1965DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single-arm clinical
8
marketing authorizations
8
2010 2019
8
clinical trials
4
trials pivotal
4
pivotal evidence
4
evidence cancer
4
cancer drug
4
drug approval
4
approval retrospective
4

Similar Publications

Anlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown encouraging antitumor activity in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. The efficacy of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we designed this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib maintenance therapy following first-line treatment with paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The localization of pulmonary nodules is crucial for surgical intervention. However, a safe, simple, and efficient method remains elusive. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a newly developed preoperative localization method for pulmonary nodules called Rapid Localization of Pulmonary Nodules On-Site (RLPN-OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Due to the heterogeneity of literature findings, stent type selection for the endovascular treatment of complex aorto-iliac occlusive disease remains challenging. The BELSTREAM study, a physician-initiated, prospective, multicenter, single-arm study, aims to report the safety and efficacy of the balloon expandable LifeStream Peripheral Stent Graft System (BD, Tempe, Arizona, USA) for the treatment of complex TASC C and D aorto-iliac artery lesions.

Methods: Seventy patients and 133 lesions were included at six Belgian institutions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To address the issue that most microsatellite-stable (MSS) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have minimal response to immunotherapy, this meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab and tremelimumab with concomitant treatment in treating MSS/pMMR metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods: All included trials were prospective studies with a median patient age of 63 years, of which 94.2% were MSS/pMMR mCRC patients, with a male to female ratio of 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: interim analysis results from the phase IIIb AMETHISTA trial.

ESMO Open

January 2025

Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milan), Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, (Milan), Italy. Electronic address:

Background: The treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with atezolizumab and bevacizumab led to significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response rate compared with sorafenib in the phase III IMbrave150 trial. The etiology of background liver disease can differ between Eastern and Western populations, leading to a potentially different impact of systemic therapies; therefore the unequal representation must be considered in the IMbrave150 trial. To provide further data on the safety and effectiveness of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the phase IIIb AMETHISTA (Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in METastatic HCC Italian Safety TriAl) ran in a Western (Italian) population of patients with advanced HCC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!