A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of respiratory center function in congenital central hypoventilation syndrome by monitoring electrical activity of the diaphragm. | LitMetric

Background: A definitive diagnosis of congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) is made by genetic testing. However, there are only a few examinations that warrant genetic testing. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) reflects neural respiratory drive from respiratory center to diaphragm. We evaluated the function of the respiratory center in CCHS by Edi monitoring.

Methods: Monitoring of Edi was performed in six CCHS cases without mechanical ventilation. The monitoring time was 30 consecutive minutes from wakefulness to sleep. The TcPCO or EtCO and SpO were recorded simultaneously.

Results: The Edi peak during wakefulness was 14.0 (10.3-21.0) µV and the Edi peak during sleep was 6.7 (3.8-8.0) µV. The Edi peak during sleep was significantly lower than the Edi peak during wakefulness, and patients were in a state of hypoventilation. Although TcPCO or EtCO increased due to hypoventilation, an increase in the Edi peak that reflects central respiratory drive was not observed. ΔEdi/ΔCO was -0.06μV/mmHg. Maximum EtCO or TcPco was 51 mmHg, and the average SpO was 91.5% during monitoring.

Conclusions: We confirmed that Edi monitoring could evaluate the function of the respiratory center and reproduce the hypoventilation of CCHS. The present study suggested that Edi monitoring is a useful examination in deciding whether to perform genetic testing or not and it may lead to an early diagnosis of CCHS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ped.14359DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

edi peak
20
respiratory center
16
genetic testing
12
edi
10
congenital central
8
central hypoventilation
8
hypoventilation syndrome
8
electrical activity
8
activity diaphragm
8
respiratory drive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!