AI Article Synopsis

  • High-intensity statins are recommended for high-risk cardiovascular disease patients, and alternative treatments like ezetimibe and evolocumab are assessed for those who can't achieve LDL cholesterol control with statins alone.
  • A study of 1,427 patients highlighted that evolocumab significantly lowered LDL cholesterol levels by 55-61%, while ezetimibe only reduced it by 18-20%, indicating a substantial difference in effectiveness.
  • Both treatments showed a good safety profile, but evolocumab was more effective in achieving lipid goals and may influence treatment decisions for patients struggling with statin therapy.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Clinicians, payers, guideline committees, and policymakers support the use of high-intensity statins in patients at high risk for complications of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guidelines and recommendations provide guidance on next steps for patients with inadequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control on maximally tolerated statin or for those who are statin-intolerant. Ezetimibe and evolocumab improve CV outcomes when added to statins in high-CV-risk populations. The aim of the study was to compare evolocumab and ezetimibe for lipid-lowering efficacy and safety.

Methods: We summarized data from 1427 patients from three phase 3 evolocumab studies comparing double-blinded evolocumab vs. ezetimibe. These studies evaluated four distinct populations: those free of CVD receiving each agent as monotherapy, patients with CVD receiving add-on therapy to low- or high-intensity statin, and statin-intolerant patients. Lipid efficacy and safety were reported at week 12.

Results: Across the studies, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by a mean 55-61% from baseline to week 12; ezetimibe lowered LDL-C by 18-20% from baseline (mean difference = 38-43% favoring evolocumab; p < 0.0001). This corresponded to absolute reductions in LDL-C of 60-104 mg/dL with evolocumab vs. 17-35 mg/dL with ezetimibe. Evolocumab also significantly improved other lipids and led to a higher percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals vs. ezetimibe. Adverse events and discontinuation rates (oral and parenteral therapy) were balanced across groups, suggesting good tolerance and acceptance of both treatments.

Conclusions: Evolocumab outperformed ezetimibe in efficacy and lipid goal attainment. Both products demonstrated good safety/tolerability. These data may help guide access decisions for high-risk patients with inadequate treatment response or intolerance to statin therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584715PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00181-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ezetimibe evolocumab
8
efficacy safety
8
three phase
8
statin statin-intolerant
8
evolocumab ezetimibe
8
cvd receiving
8
evolocumab
7
patients
5
comparison ezetimibe
4
evolocumab atherogenic
4

Similar Publications

Variation in lipoprotein(a) response to potent lipid lowering: The role of apolipoprotein (a) isoform size.

J Clin Lipidol

December 2024

Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine. 530 First Avenue, HCC5, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a driver of residual cardiovascular risk. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) decrease Lp(a) with significant heterogeneity in response. We investigated contributors to the heterogeneous response.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of inclisiran plus standard of care (SoC; comprising statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate) in primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia from a Singapore healthcare system perspective. Inclisiran + SoC was separately compared with SoC, alirocumab + SoC, and evolocumab + SoC.

Methods: A lifetime Markov model in the United Kingdom (UK) was adapted to the Singapore setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been determined as an established risk factor for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite the recommendation for in-hospital initiation of high-intensity statin therapy in AIS patients, achieving the desired target LDL-C levels remains challenging. Evolocumab, a highly effective and quickly acting agent for reducing LDL-C levels, has yet to undergo extensively exploration in the acute phase of AIS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Statin-associated autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse event. Currently, no studies have investigated the association between AIH and different statins.

Research Design And Methods: This retrospective analysis of statin-associated AIH utilized the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (Q1 2004 to Q1 2024) and a systematic literature review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardio-cerebral vascular diseases due to atherosclerosis are still the leading cause of death worldwide. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B have been identified as the primary factors responsible for the atherosclerotic process, with a causal effect. Many drugs aimed at reducing LDL-C levels are already on the market, acting in different ways in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!