Artifact-free CT images for electron beam therapy using a patient-specific non metallic shield.

Phys Med

Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Robotics Research Laboratory for Extreme Environment, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

Published: July 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Patient CT images taken with metallic shields show artifacts, complicating accurate dose calculations in radiotherapy.
  • A Monte Carlo-based method was created to assess the dosimetric impact of metallic shields, using dummy shields made from 3D scanning and printing for two patients.
  • The study found that dosimetric results from Monte Carlo simulations better aligned with measured data compared to traditional treatment planning systems, highlighting potential overestimation in dose calculations for the lens with the latter.

Article Abstract

Patient's CT images taken with metallic shields for radiotherapy suffer from artifacts. Furthermore, the treatment planning system (TPS) has a limitation on accurate dose calculations for high density materials. In this study, a Monte Carlo (MC)-based method was developed to accurately evaluate the dosimetric effect of the metallic shield. Two patients with a commercial tungsten shield of lens and two patients with a custom-made lead shield of lip were chosen to produce their non-metallic dummy shields using 3D scanner and printer. With these dummy shields, we generated artifact-free CT images. The maximum CT number allowed in TPS was assigned to metallic shields. MC simulations with real material information were carried out. In addition, clinically relevant dose-volumetric parameters were calculated for the comparison between MC and TPS. Relative dosimetry was performed using radiochromic films. The dose reductions below metallic structures were shown on MC dose distributions, but not evident on TPS dose distributions. The differences in dose-volumetric parameters of PTV between TPS and MC for eye shield cases were not clearly shown. However, the mean dose of lens from TPS and MC was different. The MC results were in superior agreement with measured data in relative dosimetry. The lens dose could be overestimated by TPS. The differences in dose-volumetric parameters of PTV between TPS and MC were generally larger in lip cases than in eye cases. The developed method is useful in predicting the realistic dose distributions around the organs blocked by the metallic shields.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metallic shields
12
dose-volumetric parameters
12
dose distributions
12
artifact-free images
8
metallic shield
8
tps
8
dummy shields
8
relative dosimetry
8
differences dose-volumetric
8
parameters ptv
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!