AI Article Synopsis

  • The Shelhigh™ SuperStentless aortic valve bioprosthesis faced a recall in 2007 due to malfunction, but it has since been reintegrated, and limited data exists on its long-term durability.
  • Between 2002 and 2007, 44 patients underwent surgery using this device, with an average follow-up of 9.2 years, revealing a stable hemodynamic performance despite initially suboptimal outcomes.
  • The study found a 65.9% mortality rate during follow-up, but survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 97.7%, 85.8%, and 54% respectively, indicating satisfactory patient survival, though ongoing monitoring is recommended.

Article Abstract

Background: The Shelhigh™ SuperStentless (Shelhigh, INC., Union, NJ, USA) is a stentless aortic valve bioprosthesis and aortic root valved conduit. In 2007, this device was recalled by FDA due to malfunction, and subsequently reintegrated by BioIntegral Surgical™ Few data are available over late durability of this device. We performed a long-term follow-up of Shelhigh™ devices implanted at our center.

Methods: Between 2002 and 2007, 44 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a Shelhigh™ device (40 aortic valve bioprosthesis and 4 valved conduit). We performed a clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (9.2 years±4.3). Standardized definitions of valve-related events were adopted.

Results: At discharge, maximum and mean aortic gradients averaged 36.1±11.3 and 21.0±6.8 mmHg, respectively. The 30-days mortality was 2.3%. Over the follow-up period, 29 patients died (65.9%); 2 deaths were valve related. Overall survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 97.7%, 85.8% and 54% respectively. At last echocardiography, average transvalvular gradients had remained globally stable in the population (33.6±12 and 20.4±10.5 mmHg). Eight (19%) structural valve deterioration (SVD) events were reported. Two (5%) non-structural valve dysfunction (NSVD) events occurred (periprosthetic leak). Two (5%) infectious endocarditis events and two (5%) valve thromboses were also deplored. Three (7%) patients required re-operation (2 due to SVD and 1 due to endocarditis).

Conclusions: The immediate hemodynamic performance of the Shelhigh™ aortic bioprostheses was unexpectedly suboptimal. Despite this, hemodynamic performance remained stable over time. Patients survival at follow-up was satisfactory, however, continued surveillance is necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11219-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortic valve
16
valved conduit
12
long-term follow-up
8
follow-up shelhigh™
8
shelhigh™ superstentless
8
bioprosthesis aortic
8
valve
8
valve bioprosthesis
8
hemodynamic performance
8
aortic
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!