A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of endodontic cavity access on curved root canal preparation with ProDesign Logic rotary instruments. | LitMetric

Influence of endodontic cavity access on curved root canal preparation with ProDesign Logic rotary instruments.

Clin Oral Investig

Endodontic Division, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2492 - Bairro Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.

Published: February 2021

Objective: This study evaluates whether endodontic cavity access into molars influences the chemomechanical preparation of curved root canals.

Materials And Methods: Twenty mesiobuccal canals of maxillary molars were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 10), according to the type of endodontic access analyzed (conventional and minimally invasive). The preparations were made by a single operator, and the canals, after access, were prepared with Logic system (0.25, 0.04 taper) along the working length. Samples were scanned before and after canal preparation (SMX-90CT Plus (Shimadzu® microtomograph operated with 70 kV, 100 uA, FOV (XY) 13.3 mm, FOV (Z) 7.0 mm, and voxel size 0.013 mm/Pix)) to match canal volumes. Images were analyzed to evaluate surface areas, transport, and centralization at 3 mm from the canal entrance and 3 mm from the apex (OnDemand3D Dental software). Student's t test with a significance level of 5% was used for the statistical analysis.

Results: Regardless of the position of the analyzed canals, there was no difference in the prepared area regarding the transport and centralization of the endodontic instrument between the two types of cavity accesses performed.

Conclusions: The conventional and minimally invasive access did not influence the action of the 0.25 and 0.04 taper instrument during the curved root canal preparation.

Clinical Relevance: The type of endodontic access did not influence the action of the rotary instrument during the curved root canal preparation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03390-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

curved root
16
root canal
12
canal preparation
12
endodontic cavity
8
cavity access
8
type endodontic
8
endodontic access
8
conventional minimally
8
minimally invasive
8
025 004
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!