Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles focused on odontoid screw fixation (OSF) and screw-related complications or non-union rates.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and Crossref databases between January 1982 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria comprised detailed descriptions of the surgical technique and screw-related complications (screw cut-out, loosening, breakage, malposition) or fusion rates.

Results: The initial selection consisted of 683 abstracts. A total of 150 full texts were chosen for detailed study, and 83 articles were included in the analysis. The point estimates for screw-related complications were as follows: 1. screw malposition frequency-4.8%; 2. screw cut-out rate-5.0%; 3. screw loosening/pull-out-3.8%; and 4. screw fracture rate-3.1%. The point estimate for the non-union rate was 9.7%. Statistical analysis of the screw-related complications rate based on surgical technique details was also performed CONCLUSIONS: Double-screw OSF performance in elder patients resulted in a higher risk of post-operative screw cut-out. In other cases, the development of screw-related complications did not depend on the method of intraoperative head fixation, selection of the implant entry point for OSF, type of the used screws, or cannulated instruments application. The outcomes of single-screw fixation through the anterior lip of the C2 vertebra were comparable to other techniques of OSF. Further, statistically reliable studies should be carried out to identify the optimal technique of OSF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06501-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screw-related complications
24
systematic review
12
screw cut-out
12
screw
8
odontoid screw
8
screw fixation
8
review meta-analysis
8
surgical technique
8
complications screw
8
screw-related
6

Similar Publications

Limitations of current robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion systems.

Neurosurg Focus

December 2024

2Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Objective: As robot systems for spine surgery have been developed, they have demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in screw placement without sacrificing safety or surgical efficiency. These robotic systems offer preoperative planning and real-time feedback to enhance surgical precision and mitigate human error. Nevertheless, limitations to their optimal performance remain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study is a retrospective cohort analysis aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of advanced imaging in confirming the placement of robotic pedicle screws during lumbar spinal fusion.
  • It involved 70 patients who had a total of 354 screws placed, with a staggering 99.2% achieving an acceptable accuracy rating (GRS type A), and no screw-related complications reported.
  • The findings suggest that robotic systems can accurately place screws without the need for 3D imaging, which could be reserved for cases with increased clinical concern due to associated radiation and operative time risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intra operative three dimensional navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion typically requires apnoea for reliable image production. However this carries potential risks to the physiologically compromised patients such as patients having COPD, obesity, cardiac illnesses, and anaemia. In such patients' safe apnoea time may be as low as 1 min, and can cause life threatening complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Imperfect fitting of the navigation template leads to prolonged surgery time and increased blood loss. These problems have not been effectively addressed in previous research. This study explores the efficacy of a novel 5-point positioning point-contact pedicle navigation template in complex pedicle situations in scoliosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement through different surgical approaches and to guide the clinical selection of appropriate robot-assisted surgical approaches.

Methods: The clinical data of 14 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral diseases who met the selection criteria between January 2023 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and all of them underwent pedicle screw placement under assistant of the Mazor X spinal surgery robot through different surgical approaches. The patients were divided into posterior median approach (PMA) group ( =6) and intermuscular approach (IMA) group ( =8) according to the surgical approaches, and there was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, disease type, and fixed segment between the two groups ( >0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!