AI Article Synopsis

  • The prevalence of diverticulosis and acute diverticulitis is rising in developed countries, with mild cases often manageable in primary care settings to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.
  • A study evaluated the management of suspected diverticulitis in primary care by analyzing consultations from 2017-2019, revealing that a significant portion of patients did not receive timely follow-up or proper antibiotic treatment as per NICE guidelines.
  • Only a small percentage of patients required hospital admission after primary care management, highlighting the need for improved adherence to established standards, particularly in antibiotic prescribing.

Article Abstract

Background: The prevalence of diverticulosis and acute diverticulitis is increasing in developed countries. For those with diverticulosis the lifetime risk of developing acute diverticulitis is about 4-25%. Mild, uncomplicated diverticulitis can be, and often is, managed safely in a primary care setting, avoiding unnecessary admission.

Aim: To evaluate management of suspected diverticulitis in primary care against standards set by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and review admission rates following primary care management.

Method: An electronic search on EMIS Web using Read codes 'diverticulitis', 'diverticulosis', and 'diverticular disease', with a specified period of 2017-2019. All consultations with suggestions of an infective flare of diverticular disease were included in the study. Clinical data from the consultations were extracted and retrospectively audited.

Results: A total of 64 patients were identified with diverticular disease or diverticulosis. Of those, 42% ( = 27) presented to primary care with presenting complaints suspicious of diverticulitis. A total of 64 consultations were reviewed, as several patients presented more than once in the study period. Of the consultations reviewed, 12.5% ( = 8) resulted in referral to the surgical assessment unit. Antibiotics were prescribed after 68.4% ( = 39) of consultations. Bloods for inflammatory markers were performed after 19.3% ( = 11) of consultations. Only 3.5% ( = 2) of patients were reviewed within the recommended 48-hour timeframe. Only 3.5% ( = 2) of patients subsequently deteriorated and required admission.

Conclusion: The management of diverticulitis in this primary care centre is not fully concordant with NICE guidelines. There is a need to improve adherence, in particular antibiotic regimen when deciding to prescribe antibiotics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X711665DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary care
24
diverticulitis primary
12
diverticulitis
8
diverticulitis managed
8
management diverticulitis
8
acute diverticulitis
8
diverticular disease
8
consultations reviewed
8
35% patients
8
primary
7

Similar Publications

Background: : With more than 60 million new cases around the world each year, traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes substantial mortality and morbidity. Managing TBI is a major human, social, and economic concern. In the last 20 years, there has been an increase in clinical trials in neurocritical care, leading mostly to negative results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the effect of an emergency department (ED) standardized clinical guideline for adolescent heavy menstrual bleeding on the rate of return ED visits and ED provider history-taking and management of this condition.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients less than 18 years old presenting to a single academic children's hospital ED between 2010 and 2020 with a chief complaint of heavy menstrual bleeding were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The effect of background noise on auscultation accuracy for different lung sound classes under standardised conditions, especially at lower to medium levels, remains largely unexplored. This article aims to evaluate the impact of three levels of Gaussian white noise (GWN) on the ability to identify three classes of lung sounds.

Methods And Materials: A pre-post pilot study assessing the impact of GWN on a group of students' ability to identify lung sounds was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Evidence-based medicine and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful tools in the wound care field, but few studies correlating quality of life (QoL) changes with objective changes exist.

Objective: To investigate the QoL changes following the shift from primary dressings alone to elastic compression bandages in patients with a new diagnosis of vascular skin ulcer, and to evaluate a possible correlation between objective and subjective changes.

Materials And Methods: This study included 122 patients with a new diagnosis of vascular skin ulcer, who had previously used only primary dressings alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) assesses shortcomings and unmet needs in wound care by partnering with key stakeholders, such as the National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), industry leaders, and expert health care providers and researchers, to advance the study of wound healing. Through this work, the WCCC has identified a few key barriers to innovation in wound care. The WCCC aims to accelerate the development of science-based, patient-centered solutions and address public policy challenges related to ensuring patients receive early access to innovative treatment options.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!