Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat.

PeerJ

Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioignegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Published: June 2020

Background: Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity and maximal angles within single homogeneous group between the HBBS and LBBS for 60% one repetition maximum (1RM), 65% 1RM and 70% 1RM.

Methods: Twelve healthy men (age 24.3  ± 2.8 years, height 178.8  ± 5.6 cm, body mass 88.3  ± 11.5 kg), experienced in powerlifting performed HBBS and LBBS with comparable external loads equal 60% 1RM, 65% 1RM, and 70% 1RM. Electromyography (EMG) signals of muscle groups were synchronously recorded alongside kinematic data (joints angle) by means of a motion capture system.

Results: EMG activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than in HBBS for all selected muscles (60% 1RM and 65% 1RM) ( < 0.05). All examined muscles were more activated during concentric phase of the squat cycle ( < 0.05). In the concentric phase, significant differences between the loads were generally not observed between just 5% 1RM change in load level for LBBS.

Conclusions: Our results confirmed significant differences in muscles activation between both squat techniques. Muscle activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than HBBS. The differences are crucial for posterior muscle chain during eccentric phase of squat cycle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289144PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9256DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

1rm 65%
12
65% 1rm
12
low-bar squat
8
hbbs lbbs
8
1rm 70%
8
60% 1rm
8
1rm
7
muscle activation
4
activation varies
4
varies high-bar
4

Similar Publications

Acute Co-Ingestion of Caffeine and Sodium Bicarbonate on Muscular Endurance Performance.

Nutrients

December 2024

Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Área de Educación Física y Deportiva, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Alcalá, 28801 Madrid, Spain.

Caffeine and sodium bicarbonate individually enhance muscular endurance by delaying fatigue, but their combined effects have scarcely been studied. : This study aimed to evaluate the acute effects of co-ingesting caffeine and sodium bicarbonate on muscular endurance at different loads in bench press and back squat exercises. : Twenty-seven recreationally trained participants (female/male: 14/14; age: 23 ± 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to determine the effect of complex training (CT) on post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) effect magnitude, 5- and 30-m linear sprint, 5-0-5 change-of-direction (COD), back squat (BS) and hip thrust (HT) one-repetition maximum [1RM], and jumping performance (countermovement jump [CMJ], drop jump [DJ], and broad jump [BJ]). The PAPE effect was elicited before and after each intervention by 3 BS repetitions at 90% 1RM and verified by CMJ performance. Twenty-four soccer players were randomly and equally assigned to 6 weeks of either medium (MED; [65-70%1RM]) or high-intensity (HIGH; [80-85%1RM]) CT performed twice a week.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background & Aims: Prehabilitation is a preoperative multimodal program including exercise, nutritional, and psychological support. Little is known about changes in nutritional status during prehabilitation.

Methods: This secondary analysis of the PREHAB trial aims to assess changes in nutritional status and explore the effectiveness of a four-week nutritional intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Acute Responses of Low-Load Resistance Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol

December 2024

Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a popular resistance exercise technique purported to increase metabolic stress and augment training adaptations over time. However, short-term use may lead to acute neuromuscular fatigue and higher exertion ratings. The purpose of the current study was to examine acute physiological responses to low-load resistance exercise utilizing BFR compared to higher-load, non-BFR resistance exercise.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study examined how different types of blood flow restriction (BFR) cuffs, single-chamber (SC-BFR) and multi-chamber (MC-BFR), affect exercise performance, heart responses, and feelings during workouts when participants exercise until they can't anymore.
  • Twenty-seven active participants performed resistance training under three conditions: SC-BFR, MC-BFR, and no BFR (N-BFR) to analyze various metrics like heart rate and exercise discomfort.
  • Results showed that SC-BFR resulted in less overall reps and lower discomfort compared to the other methods, indicating that the type of BFR cuff used significantly influences exercise outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!