Neurochemical evidence of astrocytic and neuronal injury commonly found in COVID-19.

Neurology

From the Department of Infectious Diseases (N.K., L.-M.A., A.Y., M.L., M.G.), Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, and Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine (N.J.A.), University of Gothenburg; Region Västra Götaland (N.K., L.-M.A., A.Y., M.G.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gothenburg; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (N.J.A., K.B., H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal; King's College London (N.J.A.), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK; Department of Mathematical Sciences (S.N.), Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (K.B., H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Neurology (R.W.P.), University of California San Francisco.

Published: September 2020

Objective: To test the hypothesis that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has an impact on the CNS by measuring plasma biomarkers of CNS injury.

Methods: We recruited 47 patients with mild (n = 20), moderate (n = 9), or severe (n = 18) COVID-19 and measured 2 plasma biomarkers of CNS injury by single molecule array, neurofilament light chain protein (NfL; a marker of intra-axonal neuronal injury) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAp; a marker of astrocytic activation/injury), in samples collected at presentation and again in a subset after a mean of 11.4 days. Cross-sectional results were compared with results from 33 age-matched controls derived from an independent cohort.

Results: The patients with severe COVID-19 had higher plasma concentrations of GFAp ( = 0.001) and NfL ( < 0.001) than controls, while GFAp was also increased in patients with moderate disease ( = 0.03). In patients with severe disease, an early peak in plasma GFAp decreased on follow-up ( < 0.01), while NfL showed a sustained increase from first to last follow-up ( < 0.01), perhaps reflecting a sequence of early astrocytic response and more delayed axonal injury.

Conclusion: We show neurochemical evidence of neuronal injury and glial activation in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19. Further studies are needed to clarify the frequency and nature of COVID-19-related CNS damage and its relation to both clinically defined CNS events such as hypoxic and ischemic events and mechanisms more closely linked to systemic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and consequent immune activation, as well as to evaluate the clinical utility of monitoring plasma NfL and GFAp in the management of this group of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010111DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neuronal injury
12
severe covid-19
12
neurochemical evidence
8
plasma biomarkers
8
biomarkers cns
8
moderate severe
8
injury glial
8
patients severe
8
patients moderate
8
follow-up 001
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!