A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intralesional cryotherapy versus cryotherapy spray for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts: a prospective, randomized study. | LitMetric

Intralesional cryotherapy versus cryotherapy spray for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts: a prospective, randomized study.

J Dermatolog Treat

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Andrology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Published: March 2022

Background: Recalcitrant plantar warts are representing a therapeutic challenge. Intralesional cryotherapy (ILC) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option in recalcitrant plantar warts treatment.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of (ILC) versus Cryotherapy spray (Cryo-sp) for treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts.

Methods: One hundred-thirty patients with recalcitrant plantar warts were assigned equally to two groups. Group A received ILC and group B treated with Cryo-SP. Both groups received one session at 2 weeks intervals until complete clearance or for a maximum of 5 sessions. The main outcome was complete clearance of warts guided by dermoscopy. Follow-up was carried out for 6 months after the treatment.

Results: Complete clearance occurred in 80.3% in group A compared to 50.8% in group B with a highly significant difference between both groups ( < .001). The clearance rate was faster in group A (1.5 ± 0.40) than group B (4 ± 1.3) ( < .001). The adverse effects were mild in group A than group B ( < .001). The recurrence rate was 2% in group A versus 23.3% in group B ( < .007).patients satisfaction was higher in ILC ( < .001).

Conclusion: Intralesional cryotherapy is more effective, requiring few sessions with a low recurrence rate than cryo-sp.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2020.1782821DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

recalcitrant plantar
20
plantar warts
16
complete clearance
12
intralesional cryotherapy
8
versus cryotherapy
8
cryotherapy spray
8
treatment recalcitrant
8
recalcitrant
5
plantar
5
warts
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!