AI Article Synopsis

  • Ramucirumab (RAM) combined with weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) is a common second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, but the ABSOLUTE trial showed that weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (w-nab-PTX) is equally effective in terms of overall survival.
  • This study, known as the P-SELECT trial, aims to determine if w-nab-PTX plus RAM is more effective than wPTX plus RAM for patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer.
  • The trial is a phase II study enrolling 105 patients, comparing the two treatment regimens, with the primary focus on overall survival and key secondary outcomes like progression-free survival and quality of life

Article Abstract

Background: Ramucirumab (RAM) with weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) is a standard second-line therapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX), an albumin-bound form of PTX, was developed to improve the therapeutic index of taxane treatment. However, the ABSOLUTE trial showed the non-inferiority of weekly nab-PTX (w-nab-PTX) to wPTX with respect to overall survival (OS) as second-line therapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, and subgroup analysis of patients with peritoneal dissemination showed favourable OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in the w-nab-PTX arm compared to those in the wPTX arm. This study evaluated whether w-nab-PTX plus RAM is more effective than wPTX plus RAM for patients with peritoneal dissemination.

Methods: The P-SELECT trial (WJOG10617G) is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised phase II study evaluating wPTX plus RAM (arm A) versus w-nab-PTX plus RAM (arm B). Key eligibility criteria include the following: 1) histologically proven adenocarcinoma, 2) unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer, 3) peritoneal dissemination, 4) intolerance or refractory to first-line therapy including fluoropyrimidines, and 5) ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0-2. Patients are randomised to either arm at a 1:1 ratio stratified by institution, PS, and severity of ascites. PTX (80 mg/m; days 1, 8, and 15) and RAM (8 mg/kg; days 1 and 15) are administered every 4 weeks in arm A, while nab-PTX (100 mg/m; days 1, 8, and 15) instead of PTX is administered in arm B. The primary endpoint is OS, and the main secondary endpoints are PFS, objective response rate, safety, neuropathy-specific quality of life, and biomarkers. To maintain a probability of ≥70% to ensure the hazard ratio for OS in arm B is lower than 0.90, 105 subjects are required. The study was initiated in October 2018 and is being conducted in 58 centres of the West Japan Oncology Group.

Discussion: The results of this study will determine whether w-nab-PTX plus RAM has the potential to be a preferred therapeutic option for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination, compared to wPTX plus RAM.

Trial Registration: This study was prospectively registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180022, October 1, 2018).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291575PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07047-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

recurrent gastric
20
gastric cancer
20
advanced recurrent
16
peritoneal dissemination
16
cancer peritoneal
12
w-nab-ptx ram
12
weekly paclitaxel
8
refractory first-line
8
p-select trial
8
randomised phase
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!