This study investigates research integrity among PhD students in health sciences at three universities in Scandinavia (Stockholm, Oslo, Odense). A questionnaire with questions on knowledge, attitudes, experiences, and behavior was distributed to PhD students and obtained a response rate of 77.7%. About 10% of the respondents agreed that research misconduct strictly defined (such as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, FFP) is common in their area of research, while slightly more agreed that other forms of misconduct is common. A nonnegligible segment of the respondents was willing to fabricate, falsify, or omit contradicting data if they believe that they are right in their overall conclusions. Up to one third reported to have added one or more authors unmerited. Results showed a negative correlation between "good attitudes" and self-reported misconduct and a positive correlation between how frequent respondents thought that misconduct occurs and whether they reported misconduct themselves. This reveals that existing educational and research systems partly fail to foster research integrity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488824 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1556264620929230 | DOI Listing |
Acta Bioeng Biomech
September 2024
PhD, Associate Professor and Researcher Sports Science Department, Vice-president of Faculty of Human Social Sciences University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal; Research Center in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal.
From a current perspective, it is understood that body posture is influenced by individual asymmetries, cultural context, habitual body patterns, etiological factors and psychosocial factors allocated to the individual. Clarifying the musculoskeletal cause that originated the postural alteration is considered the clinical challenge in the treatment of pain or discomfort. Recent studies have shown the influence of changes in body weight on the distribution of plantar pressure and foot pain, emphasizing the importance of understanding these relationships.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNurs Educ Perspect
January 2025
About the Authors Elizabeth A. Gazza, PhD, RN, LCCE, FACCE, ANEF, is professor, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina Wilmington (UNCW), Wilmington, North Carolina. April D. Matthias, PhD, RN, CNE, is professor and MSN-Nurse Educator Programs coordinator, UNCW School of Nursing. Megan Atkins, is a BSN student, UNCW School of Nursing. The authors acknowledge the participants who volunteered to share their experience as peer reviewers for professional nursing journals with the researchers. Contact Dr. Gazza at for more information.
Aim: The aim of this study was to uncover what it is like to be a novice peer reviewer for journals that publish articles that can influence nursing education and/or practice.
Background: Comprehensive and effective approaches to reviewer development, based on reviewer experience, were not reported in the literature.
Method: The study followed a hermeneutic phenomenological approach.
Pak J Med Sci
January 2025
Syed Imran Mehmood, MBBS, MA, MMedED (UK), PhD (Netherlands) Dow Institute of Health Professionals Education, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Background And Objective: In medical education, the challenging constructs of emotional intelligence and professionalism are increasingly being addressed worldwide and seem to share common characteristic components. The objective of this study was to determine the association between emotional intelligence and professionalism as perceived and self-reported by medical students and to explore the gender difference in these two variables.
Methods: It is a cross-sectional study of eight months duration, from February-September 2019, that included final year medical students at Dow Medical College through convenience sampling.
Adv Radiat Oncol
February 2025
Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Purpose: Ultrahypofractionation presents challenges for a subset of high-risk prostate cancer patients due to the large planning target volume (PTV) margin required for the seminal vesicles. Online adaptive radiation therapy could potentially reduce this margin. This paper focuses on the development, preclinical validation, and clinical testing of online adaptive robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for this patient group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Form Res
January 2025
Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, United Kingdom, 44 07742966769.
Background: The rapid proliferation of health apps has not been matched by a comparable growth in scientific evaluations of their effectiveness, particularly for apps available to the public. This gap has prompted ongoing debate about the types of evidence necessary to validate health apps, especially as the perceived risk level varies from wellness tools to diagnostic aids. The perspectives of the general public, who are direct stakeholders, are notably underrepresented in discussions on digital health evidence generation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!