While proton therapy can offer increased sparing of healthy tissue compared with X-ray therapy, it can be difficult to predict whether a benefit can be expected for an individual patient. Predictive modelling may aid in this respect. However, the predictions of these models can be affected by uncertainties in radiobiological model parameters and in planned dose. The aim of this work is to present a Markov model that incorporates these uncertainties to compare clinical outcomes for individualised proton and X-ray therapy treatments. A time-inhomogeneous fuzzy Markov model was developed which estimates the response of a patient to a given treatment plan in terms of quality adjusted life years. These are calculated using the dose-dependent probabilities of tumour control and toxicities as transition probabilities in the model. Dose-volume data representing multiple isotropic patient set-up uncertainties and range uncertainties (for proton therapy) are included to model dose delivery uncertainties. The model was retrospectively applied to an example patient as a demonstration. When uncertainty in the radiobiological model parameter was considered, the model predicted that proton therapy would result in an improved clinical outcome compared with X-ray therapy. However, when dose delivery uncertainty was included, there was no difference between the two treatments. By incorporating uncertainties in the predictive modelling calculations, the fuzzy Markov concept was found to be well suited to providing a more holistic comparison of individualised treatment outcomes for proton and X-ray therapy. This may prove to be useful in model-based patient selection strategies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00849-4 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med Res
January 2025
Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmo, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.
Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common and potentially fatal medical emergency. This study aimed to investigate the frequency, causes, outcomes, and efficacy of endoscopy in the treatment of UGIB at King Fahad Central Hospital in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2023, a retrospective study was performed including all hospitalized patients with UGIB.
Adv Radiat Oncol
February 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Purpose: Treatment options for leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) are limited. A recent phase 2 study found that proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) was well-tolerated and improved survival. We report our experience with pCSI for solid-tumor LM.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhys Imaging Radiat Oncol
January 2025
Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cancer Cell Int
January 2025
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Background: Mounting evidence underline the relevance of macromolecular complexes in cancer. Integrins frequently recruit ion channels and transporters within complexes which behave as signaling hubs. A complex composed by β1 integrin, hERG1 K channel, the neonatal form of the Na channel Na 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
January 2025
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic address:
Purpose: Proton FLASH has been investigated using cyclotron and synchrocyclotron beamlines but not synchrotron beamlines. We evaluated the impact of dose rate (ultra-high [UHDR] vs. conventional [CONV]) and beam configuration (shoot-through [ST] vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!