The correct name of the 2nd Author is presented in this paper.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09666-4 | DOI Listing |
Am J Dent
June 2024
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Purpose: To investigate the effect of different chemical compositions of primers on the bond strength between nano-ceramic, polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and zirconia ceramic materials and dual-cure cement.
Methods: Fifty 2 mm-thick specimens were prepared from Vita Enamic, Cerasmart, and Katana Zirconia UTML. The specimens were embedded in acrylic blocks.
J Prosthodont
April 2024
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Purpose: Dental ceramics deteriorate as a result of thermal aging and exposure to acidic solutions, which change their microhardness and surface roughness. This study assessed the resistance of several computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative dental materials in terms of surface roughness and microhardness following exposure to acidic solutions and thermal aging.
Materials And Methods: Five different monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials, two leucite-reinforced glass ceramics (G-Ceram and CEREC Blocs), a zirconia-infiltrated lithium silicate (Celtra Duo), a resin nanoceramic (Grandio), and monolithic zirconia (inCoris TZI), were used to create 2-mm-thick rectangular specimens (n = 100).
BMC Oral Health
April 2024
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
Background: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of two different polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and CAD-CAM materials after aging.
Methods: A total of 42 frameworks were designed and milled from 2 different PEEK discs (Copra Peek, P and BioHPP, B). P and B frameworks were divided into 3 subgroups (n = 7).
Clin Oral Investig
April 2022
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ataturk, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of various surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to polymer-infiltrated materials.
Materials And Methods: One hundred twenty-eight polymer-infiltrated specimens (n = 32) for four different computer aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials, polyether ether ketone (PEEK) (PE), polyether ketone ketone (PEKK) (PK), composite resin nanoceramic (Cerasmart) (CS), and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) (VITA ENAMIC) (VE) were milled from CAD-CAM blocks. They were divided into two groups (n = 16) in terms of surface treatments: airborne-particle abraded (AA) or silica-coated (SC) and two subgroups (n = 8) according to adhesive application or no adhesive.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of different nanocomposite resins using various analysis methods. Three types of nanocomposite resins were investigated in this study: supra-nanohybrid (Estelite Asteria), nanohybrid (GrandioSo), and nanoceramic composite resins (Ceram-X Spheretec One). Forty-eight disc-shaped specimens (4 mm in diameter, 2 mm in thickness) were fabricated using a Teflon mold and divided into four groups according to the different polishing systems (n=12).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!