A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Effect of bone grafting on the repair of distal alveolar bone defect of the second molar after extraction of mandibular impacted third molar]. | LitMetric

Purpose: To observe the effect of bone grafting during the extraction of mandibular third molar on repair of distal alveolar bone defect distal to the second molar.

Methods: The risks of the distal alveolar bone defect in the second molar were estimated after removal of the impacted teeth according to the position of the third molar and second molar before operation. It was divided into three groups: low risk group, medium risk group and high risk group. The medium risk group and high risk group were further divided into bone graft subgroup (group A) and non-bone graft subgroup (group B). There were 36 cases in group A and 45 cases in group B. Postoperative re-examination indicators included subjective perception of the patients, depth of probing and height of alveolar bone in the distal molar of the second molar by X-ray examination. The data were analyzed with SPSS 19.0 software package.

Results: Six months after operation, in mediun risk group, 0 cases in group A had subjective feelings of cold and heat stimulation; in group B, the number was 6 cases, the difference was significant (P<0.05). Distal periodontal probing depth of the second molar was (2.93±0.34) mm in group A and (2.95±0.50) mm in group B. There was no significant difference between 2 groups (P=0.931). X-ray examination of the alveolar bone height increment of the second molar Δh: (3.31±1.02) mm in group A, (3.10±1.72) mm in group B, the difference was not significant (P=0.794). In high risk group, 4 cases in group A had subjective feelings of cold and heat stimulation; in group B, the number was 10 cases,the difference was significant (P<0.05). Distal periodontal probing depth of the second molar was (3.08±0.37) mm in group A and (3.24±0.41) mm in group B. There was no significant difference between 2 groups(P=0.931). X-ray examination of the alveolar bone height increment of the second molar Δh: (5.21±1.79) mm in group A, (2.99±2.42) mm in group B, the difference was significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Risk classification of the second molar distal bone defects after extraction of the impacted teeth is essential, which is helpful to determine whether bone grafting is needed during operation. Autologous bone mixed with Bio-Oss artificial bone powder can promote recovery of the alveolar bone height of the second molar, especially in high risk group, and discomfort caused by exposure can be reduced.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk group
24
alveolar bone
16
second molar
16
distal alveolar
12
bone defect
12
group
12
group cases
12
cases group
12
bone grafting
8
repair distal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!