AI Article Synopsis

  • This study is a pilot, multicentre randomized clinical trial aimed at comparing the effects of movement pattern training (MoveTrain) and standard strengthening/flexibility exercises on function in individuals with chronic hip-related groin pain.
  • The trial included 46 participants, with high recruitment and retention rates, but displayed lower adherence to home exercise programs; both training groups showed significant improvements in function and strength without major differences between them.
  • MoveTrain resulted in better biomechanical improvements during specific movements, suggesting it may offer advantages over standard training approaches, and the successful execution supports the possibility of a larger definitive study.

Article Abstract

Study Design: Pilot, multicentre randomised clinical trial (RCT).

Objectives: Assess viability of performing a definitive RCT and compare preliminary effects of movement pattern training (MoveTrain) and strengthening/flexibility (Standard) to improve function in people with chronic hip-related groin pain (HRGP).

Background: To determine the best physical therapist-led intervention for patients with HRGP, we must understand treatment effects of different treatment modes.

Methods: Forty-six patients (17M:29F; 29±5.3 years; body mass index 25.6±6.3 kg/m) with HRGP were randomised. MoveTrain included task-specific training to optimise biomechanics during daily tasks. Standard included strengthening/flexibility. Treatment included 10 visits/12 weeks and home exercise programme (HEP). Primary outcomes for feasibility were recruitment, retention, treatment adherence and treatment fidelity. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported function (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)), lower extremity kinematics and hip muscle strength.

Results: We achieved target recruitment, and retention was excellent (91%). Patient session attendance was high (93%); however, reported HEP adherence (62%) was lower than expected. Physical therapists' adherence to treatment protocols was high (90%). Patients demonstrated high treatment receipt; 91% of exercises performed were rated independent. Both groups demonstrated clinically important improvements in function (HOOS) and muscle strength; however, there were no between-group differences (HOOS subscales, p≥0.13, strength, p≥0.34). Compared with Standard, MoveTrain demonstrated greater reductions in hip adduction (p=0.016) and pelvic drop (p=0.026) during a single leg squat. No adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: Our experience in completing this RCT confirmed that a larger, multicentre RCT is feasible and highlighted modifications we will implement to optimise the future RCT.

Trial Registration Number: NCT02913222.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254120PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000707DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

movement pattern
8
pattern training
8
compared standard
8
hip-related groin
8
groin pain
8
pilot multicentre
8
multicentre randomised
8
randomised clinical
8
clinical trial
8
recruitment retention
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!