A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Unexpectedly higher soil organic carbon accumulation in the evapotranspiration cover of a coal bottom ash mixed landfill. | LitMetric

Unexpectedly higher soil organic carbon accumulation in the evapotranspiration cover of a coal bottom ash mixed landfill.

J Environ Manage

National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

Published: August 2020

Monolayer barriers, which are usually known as evapotranspiration (ET) covers, have long been used as alternative final cover systems in waste landfills. Coal bottom ash was evaluated as a good alternative to soil in landfill ET cover systems to increase the bottom ash (BA) recycling ratio in the past. In a previous study, applying BA promoted plant growth characteristics and improved the soil physicochemical properties, particularly the soil organic carbon (SOC) content. In this study, we investigated the effect of BA on the SOC increase by examining the chemical and physical characteristics of ET cover systems, and we compared BA mixed and pure soils. We collected two types of soil from the landfill cover, namely, BA mixed soil (BA 35% + soil 65%) and soil alone (100%), for treatments during the 5th year after installation. Bottom ash mixed soil has four times more SOC than the pure soil at the surface soil layer, but the SOC contents significantly decreased with the soil depth in BA mixed soil, and no differences were found between BA mixed soil and pure soil below a 25 cm soil depth. In addition, there was no significant difference in the chemical composition of the SOC according to aC NMR. However, the allophane contents were significantly higher in BA mixed soil than pure soil, which physically protects the material from organic matter decomposition. Conclusively, the higher allophane content originating from BA might act as the primary factor in the high accumulation of soil organic carbon in the BA mixed soil layer by retarding the organic matter decomposition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110659DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mixed soil
24
soil
19
bottom ash
16
soil organic
12
organic carbon
12
cover systems
12
pure soil
12
coal bottom
8
mixed
8
ash mixed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!