Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Exosome-derived long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as novel biomarkers are widely investigated in various cancers, yet results remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify the diagnostic and prognostic value of exosome-derived lncRNAs in cancer.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and WanFang online databases were comprehensively searched for eligible studies up to January, 2020. To evaluate the diagnostic effect, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were pooled. Threshold effect, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were applied to explore heterogeneity. Deeks' funnel plot and sensitivity analysis were used to examine publication bias and stability of meta-analysis, respectively. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were calculated to assess the prognostic value.
Results: A total of 29 eligible studies involving 3882 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis, which included 26 on diagnosis and 11 on prognosis. For diagnosis analysis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.87), 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.84), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), respectively. Meta-regression revealed that the cancer type acted as the potential source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and Deeks' funnel plot indicated that results were relatively robust and had no publication bias. For the prognosis analysis, results suggested that overexpression of exosome-derived lncRNAs which upregulated in cancer showed a significant association with poor OS (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.79-2.71, p < 0.001). Conversely, overexpression of exosome-derived lncRNAs which downregulated in cancer was markedly related to better OS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.55, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis reveals that exosome-derived lncRNAs might serve as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for cancer. However, the clinical value of exosome-derived lncRNAs needs to be further confirmed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10238-020-00638-z | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!