Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Acromegaly is usually due to growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas, but it may be exceptionally caused by GH-secreting ectopic pituitary adenomas (EPA). EPA are defined as extra-sellar pituitary tumours, extra- or intra-cranially sited, entirely separated from the pituitary stalk and gland. The aim of the study is to address the challenges in the management of clival GHEPA.
Methods: We reported a case of a 53-year-old acromegalic patient with a primary clival GHEPA and reviewed systematically the relevant English literature between 1975 and 2019, in keeping with the PRISMA guidelines.
Results: Four cases of primary clival GHEPA have been described in literature apart from ours. All patients presented with acromegalic features, elevated circulating GH and/or insulin-like growth factor-1 levels. Hyperprolactinemia and empty sella were described in two cases, respectively. These tumours show the typical imaging characteristics of pituitary adenomas, but their neuroradiological diagnosis may be challenging due to their sizes and the difficulty in defining the absence of connections with the pituitary fossa.
Conclusion: Although primary clival GHEPA are exceedingly rare, even if likely under-reported in literature, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of clival tumours because of their specific management. Surgery represents the first-line treatment option, while medical and radiation therapies can be adopted as neo-adjuvant, adjuvant or primary treatments according to tumour and patient characteristics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01057-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!