Infant carrying method impacts caregiver posture and loading during gait and item retrieval.

Gait Posture

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 531, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States; Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, 2115 East Wesley Avenue, Denver, CO 80208, United States. Electronic address:

Published: July 2020

Background: Human babies are carried by their caregivers during infancy, and the use of ergonomic aids to wear the baby on the body has recently grown in popularity. However, the effects of wearing or holding a baby in-arms on an individual's mechanics during gait and a common object retrieval task are not fully understood.

Research Question: What are the differences in: 1) spatiotemporal, lower extremity kinematics, and ground reaction force variables during gait, and 2) technique, center of mass motion, and kinematics during an object retrieval task between holding and wearing an infant mannequin?

Methods: In this prospective biomechanics study, 10 healthy females performed over-ground walking and an object retrieval task in three conditions, holding: (1) nothing (unloaded), (2) an infant mannequin in-arms, and (3) an infant mannequin in a baby carrier. Mechanics were compared using repeated measures ANOVA.

Results: During gait, greater vertical ground reaction force and impulse and braking force was found during the in-arms and carrier conditions compared to unloaded. Significant but small (<5°) differences were found between conditions in lower extremity kinematics. Increased back extension was found during carrier and in-arms compared to unloaded. Step length was the only spatiotemporal parameter that differed between conditions. During object retrieval, most participants used a squatting technique to retrieve the object from the floor. They maintained a more upright posture, with less trunk flexion and anteroposterior movement of their center of mass, and also did not try to fold forward over their hips during the two loaded conditions. Lower extremity kinematics did not differ between unloaded and carrier, suggesting that babywearing may promote more similar lower extremity mechanics to not carrying anything.

Significance: Holding or wearing an infant provides a mechanical constraint that impacts the forces and kinematics, which has implications for caregivers' pain and dysfunction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423689PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

object retrieval
12
retrieval task
12
ground reaction
8
reaction force
8
infant mannequin
8
infant
4
infant carrying
4
carrying method
4
method impacts
4
impacts caregiver
4

Similar Publications

Towards Context-Rich Automated Biodiversity Assessments: Deriving AI-Powered Insights from Camera Trap Data.

Sensors (Basel)

December 2024

School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.

Camera traps offer enormous new opportunities in ecological studies, but current automated image analysis methods often lack the contextual richness needed to support impactful conservation outcomes. Integrating vision-language models into these workflows could address this gap by providing enhanced contextual understanding and enabling advanced queries across temporal and spatial dimensions. Here, we present an integrated approach that combines deep learning-based vision and language models to improve ecological reporting using data from camera traps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A hybrid attention multi-scale fusion network for real-time semantic segmentation.

Sci Rep

January 2025

School of Computer and Control Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar, 161003, China.

Article Synopsis
  • Most existing semantic segmentation algorithms prioritize semantic information over spatial details, which compromises accuracy despite improving real-time speed.
  • The paper introduces two innovative modules: HFRM, which combines channel and spatial attention to recover lost spatial information, and HFFM, designed to fuse features at different levels and capture a larger receptive field effectively.
  • Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 73.6% on the Cityscapes dataset at 176 FPS, highlighting faster inference without sacrificing accuracy, showcasing its practical use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The brain prioritizes the basic level of object category abstraction.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Bates College Program in Neuroscience, Bates College, Lewiston, ME, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Human observers tend to name objects using a mid-level of specificity called the basic level, despite the existence of multiple descriptive levels (e.g., "parka" vs. "clothing").
  • In a study, 1080 objects were shown while researchers recorded EEG to understand how quickly and dynamically the brain retrieves information about these object categories.
  • The findings revealed that the brain utilizes basic-level category information rapidly (starting around 50 ms after seeing an object) and that the processing of different task demands becomes apparent between 200-300 ms after the object is presented.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The precise and fleeting moment of rich recollection triggered by an environmental cue is difficult to reproduce in the lab. However, epilepsy patients can experience sudden reminiscences after intracranial electrical brain stimulation (EBS). In these cases, the transient brain state related to the activation of the engram and its conscious perception can be recorded using intracerebral EEG (iEEG).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

According to the predictive processing framework, our brain constantly generates predictions based on past experiences and compares these predictions with incoming sensory information. When an event contradicts these predictions, it results in a prediction error (PE), which has been shown to enhance subsequent memory. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the influence of PEs on subsequent memory remain unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!