Optimal timing of a second postoperative voiding trial in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial.

Background: Rates of postoperative incomplete bladder emptying vary significantly after pelvic reconstructive surgery. With enhanced recovery protocols the paradigm is shifting towards same-day discharge and the rates of incomplete bladder emptying are expected to increase. The optimal length of time for postoperative catheter drainage has not been clearly established. There are no current studies that assess the optimal timing of a repeat voiding trial in women who have unsuccessful same day voiding trials.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of a second voiding trial performed 2-4 days (earlier group) vs 7 days (later group) postoperatively in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal prolapse surgery. Secondary aims included postoperative urinary tract infection rates, total days with a catheter, and patient-reported catheter bother between groups.

Study Design: Across 2 sites, women undergoing multicompartment vaginal repair were enrolled. Within 6 hours postoperatively, subjects had an active retrograde voiding trial. Those who passed this voiding trial exited the study; those who had persistent incomplete bladder emptying (postvoid residual >100 mL) had a transurethral indwelling catheter placed and were randomized to return for an earlier (postoperative day 2-4) vs later (postoperative day 7) follow-up office voiding trial. Subjects were followed for 6 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was the rate of unsuccessful repeat office voiding trial. Secondary outcomes included rates of urinary tract infection, total days with a catheter, and subjective catheter bother. A power calculation based on a projected 31% difference, a power of 0.8, and an alpha of 0.05 revealed that 30 subjects were needed in each group.

Results: A total of 102 subjects were enrolled; 38 exited on postoperative day 0, leaving 64 subjects for randomization (4 of whom withdrew after randomization). A comparison of data revealed that randomization was effective, with no differences between the earlier and later groups in terms of demographic data or surgical procedures. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, women in the earlier group were more likely to be unsuccessful in their follow-up office voiding trial (23.3%) than the later group (3.3%), with a risk difference of 20% (95% confidence interval, 3.56-36.44) and a relative risk of 7.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-53.47; P=.02). A number-needed-to-treat calculation found that for every 5 patients using a catheter for 7 days postoperatively, 1 case of persistent postoperative incomplete bladder emptying was prevented. Rates of catheter bother did not differ between groups at the time of the follow-up office voiding trial or at 6 weeks (P=.09 and P=.20, respectively). Urinary tract infection rates were higher in the earlier group but did not reach statistical significance (23% vs 7%, P=.07). Regression analysis revealed that subjects who required additional pain medication refills were 9.6 times (95% confidence interval, 1.24-73.77) more likely to have persistent incomplete bladder emptying after the follow-up office voiding trial.

Conclusion: Women with incomplete bladder emptying after multicompartment prolapse repair had a 7-fold higher risk of an unsuccessful repeat office voiding trial if performed within 4 days of surgery than when performed within 7 days of surgery. In addition, requiring additional prescriptions for analgesia increased the risk of an unsuccessful follow-up office voiding trial.