E-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury in the pediatric population: imaging features at presentation and short-term follow-up.

Background: Cases of e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) have rapidly reached epidemic proportions, yet there remain limited reports within the literature on the associated imaging findings.

Objective: We describe the most common imaging findings observed on chest computed tomography (CT) and chest radiograph (CXR) at presentation and at short-term follow-up at our major pediatric hospital.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective review of the electronic medical records was performed on all patients with suspected EVALI who were treated at a major pediatric hospital and 11 patients were included for analysis. Two board-certified pediatric radiologists then categorized the CXRs as either normal or abnormal, and further performed a systematic review of the chest CTs for imaging findings in the lungs, pleura and mediastinum. Interrater discordance was reconciled by consensus review.

Results: The 11 patients (9 males:2 females) ranged in age from 14 to 18 years. Gastrointestinal and constitutional symptoms were present in all patients, whereas shortness of breath and cough were reported in 5/11 and 6/11 patients, respectively. The CXR was abnormal in 10/11 patients, whereas all chest CTs were abnormal. The most common CT findings included consolidation, ground-glass opacities, interlobular septal thickening, lymphadenopathy and crazy-paving pattern. Almost all patients demonstrated subpleural sparing, and less than half also demonstrated peribronchovascular sparing. There was complete or near-complete resolution of imaging abnormalities in 5/6 patients with a median follow-up duration of 114 days.

Conclusion: Pulmonary opacities with subpleural and peribronchovascular sparing was a commonly observed pattern of EVALI in the pediatric population at this institution. A CXR may not be sufficiently sensitive in diagnosing EVALI, and radiologists and clinicians should exercise caution when excluding EVALI based on the lack of a pulmonary opacity. Caution should also be exercised when excluding EVALI solely based on the lack of respiratory symptoms. Despite extensive pulmonary involvement at presentation, findings may resolve on short-term follow-up imaging.