AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates how the endocannabinoid system affects motivational behaviors in rats, specifically focusing on two types: sign-tracking (directed toward cues) and goal-tracking (directed toward reward delivery).
  • - Researchers administered varying doses of the cannabinoid agonist CP-55,940 to male Sprague-Dawley rats and found that it actually decreased sign-tracking behaviors while increasing goal-tracking behaviors, contrary to their initial hypothesis.
  • - The results suggest that differences in cannabinoid receptor (CB1) expression in certain brain areas might explain why some individuals are more inclined to respond to reward cues than others.

Article Abstract

Rationale: Pavlovian conditioned approach paradigms are used to characterize the nature of motivational behaviors in response to stimuli as either directed toward the cue (i.e., sign-tracking) or the site of reward delivery (i.e., goal-tracking). Recent evidence has shown that activity of the endocannabinoid system increases dopaminergic activity in the mesocorticolimbic system, and other studies have shown that sign-tracking behaviors are dependent on dopamine.

Objectives: Therefore, we hypothesized that administration of a cannabinoid agonist would increase sign-tracking and decrease goal-tracking behaviors.

Methods: Forty-seven adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were given a low, medium, or high dose of the cannabinoid agonist CP-55,940 (N = 12 per group) or saline (N = 11) before Pavlovian conditioned approach training. A separate group of rats (N = 32) were sacrificed after PCA training for measurement of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) using in situ hybridization.

Results: Contrary to our initial hypothesis, CP-55,940 dose-dependently decreased sign-tracking and increased goal-tracking behavior. CB1 expression was higher in sign-trackers compared with that in goal-trackers in the prelimbic cortex, but there were no significant differences in CB1 or FAAH expression in the infralimbic cortex, dorsal or ventral CA1, dorsal or ventral CA3, dorsal or ventral dentate gyrus, or amygdala.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that cannabinoid signaling can specifically influence behavioral biases toward sign- or goal-tracking. Pre-existing differences in CB1 expression patterns, particularly in the prelimbic cortex, could contribute to individual differences in the tendency to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502542PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05571-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dorsal ventral
12
cannabinoid receptor
8
agonist cp-55940
8
incentive salience
8
pavlovian conditioned
8
conditioned approach
8
cannabinoid agonist
8
cb1 expression
8
prelimbic cortex
8
differences cb1
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!