A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Gender underlies the formation of STEM research groups. | LitMetric

Research groups are the cornerstone of scientific research, yet little is known about how these groups are formed and how their organization is influenced by the gender of the research group leader. This represents an important gap in our understanding of the processes shaping gender structure within universities and the academic fields they represent. Here, we report the results of an email survey sent to department chairs and discipline-specific listservs. We received responses from 275 female and 175 male research group leaders. Most respondents were biologists ( = 328) but psychology ( = 27), chemistry ( = 16), physics ( = 32), and mathematics ( = 30) were also relatively well represented. We found that men were self-reported as overrepresented in research groups in the physical sciences, particularly at later career stages. Within biology, male and female group leaders reported supervising a disproportionate number of same-gender trainees (students and postdoctoral fellows), particularly early in their careers. These self-reported patterns were driven primarily by gender-based differences in the pool of students applying to their research groups, while gender differences in acceptance rates played a seemingly smaller role. We discuss the implications of our results for women continuing into the professoriate and for the recruitment of young scientists into research groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244806PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6188DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group leaders
8
groups
6
gender
4
gender underlies
4
underlies formation
4
formation stem
4
stem groups
4
groups groups
4
groups cornerstone
4
cornerstone scientific
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!