Purpose: Since the introduction of the Biotronik Linox S/SD leads in 2006, there have been multiple reports of premature lead failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the longevity of the Linox S/SD leads and to identify the possible predictors of lead failure in a single tertiary implant center.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent implantation of Linox S/SD leads or Sorin Vigila 1CR/2CR leads (the same Linox S/SD leads marketed by Sorin) at our center. The cumulative lead survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curve, and variables associated with lead failure were assessed by Cox proportional hazard model.
Results: A total of 187 patients (154 (82%) male) underwent Linox S/SD or Vigila 1CR/2CR implantation between 2007 and 2013. During follow-up with a median time of 75 months, nine lead failures were identified (4.8%). The mean and median times from lead implantation to lead failure were 70.7 ± 21 months and 64 (45-111) months, respectively. The cumulative survival probability for the Linox S/SD at 5 years was 97.1% and at 12 years was 90.3%. Non-physiological high-rate sensing was the most common type of lead failure in patients. In two-thirds of these patients, this led to inappropriate shock. We did not find any significant relationships between patients' clinical and procedural characteristics and lead failure.
Conclusions: At our center, the 5-year lead survival of the Linox S/SD has been better than reports from other centers. The majority of lead failures presented as non-physiological high-rate sensing with subsequent inappropriate therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00787-x | DOI Listing |
J Arrhythm
June 2023
Department of Cardiology Tokyo Women's Medical University 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku Tokyo 162-8666 Japan.
Background: The long-term relationship between fracture-prone implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads and poor prognosis remains unclear in Japanese patients.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the records of 445 patients who underwent implantation of advisory/Linox leads (Sprint Fidelis, 118; Riata, nine; Isoline, 10; Linox S/SD, 45) and non-advisory leads (Endotak Reliance, 33; Durata, 199; Sprint non-Fidelis, 31) between January 2005 and June 2012 at our hospital. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and ICD lead failure.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol
June 2021
Monash Cardiac Rhythm Management Department, MonashHeart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Purpose: Since the introduction of the Biotronik Linox S/SD leads in 2006, there have been multiple reports of premature lead failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the longevity of the Linox S/SD leads and to identify the possible predictors of lead failure in a single tertiary implant center.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent implantation of Linox S/SD leads or Sorin Vigila 1CR/2CR leads (the same Linox S/SD leads marketed by Sorin) at our center.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
June 2020
Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Introduction: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are proven to prevent sudden death in patients at elevated risk for sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Complications related to ICD failure can stem from lead dysfunction, manufacturing defects, patient characteristics, or implantation technique. We conducted a review of all ICD leads implanted at our center from 2011 to 2017 to determine risk factors for premature lead failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeart Rhythm
October 2017
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Background: An early failure of the Biotronik Linox S/SD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead has been reported. We have also experienced several cases with early failure of Linox leads.
Objective: Our aim was to assess the longevity of Linox S/SD (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) compared with Sprint Fidelis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), Sprint Quattro (Medtronic), and Endotak Reliance (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) leads.
Heart Rhythm
December 2016
Departments of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address:
Background: After the introduction of the Biotronik Linox S/SD high-voltage lead, several cases of early failure have been observed.
Objective: The purpose of this article was to assess the performance of the Linox S/SD lead in comparison to 2 other contemporary leads.
Methods: We used the prospective Erasmus MC ICD registry to identify all implanted Linox S/SD (n = 408), Durata (St.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!