The value of early-stage phenotyping for wheat breeding in the age of genomic selection.

Theor Appl Genet

Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agriculture Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Av, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Published: August 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Genomic selection (GS) can enhance the efficiency of breeding programs by allowing more lines to be evaluated compared to traditional phenotypic selection.
  • While GS and phenotyping showed similar prediction accuracy in evaluating wheat lines, GS slightly underperformed when compared without the inclusion of stage-1 phenotypic data.
  • By using GS instead of phenotyping in the early stages, breeding programs could assess many more candidates and potentially achieve greater gains from selection.

Article Abstract

Genomic selection using data from an on-going breeding program can improve gain from selection, relative to phenotypic selection, by significantly increasing the number of lines that can be evaluated. The early stages of phenotyping involve few observations and can be quite inaccurate. Genomic selection (GS) could improve selection accuracy and alter resource allocation. Our objectives were (1) to compare the prediction accuracy of GS and phenotyping in stage-1 and stage-2 field evaluations and (2) to assess the value of stage-1 phenotyping for advancing lines to stage-2 testing. We built training populations from 1769 wheat breeding lines that were genotyped and phenotyped for yield, test weight, Fusarium head blight resistance, heading date, and height. The lines were in cohorts, and analyses were done by cohort. Phenotypes or GS estimated breeding values were used to determine the trait value of stage-1 lines, and these values were correlated with their phenotypes from stage-2 trials. This was repeated for stage-2 to stage-3 trials. The prediction accuracy of GS and phenotypes was similar to each other regardless of the amount (0, 50, 100%) of stage-1 data incorporated in the GS model. Ranking of stage-1 lines by GS predictions that used no stage-1 phenotypic data had marginally lower correspondence to stage-2 phenotypic rankings than rankings of stage-1 lines based on phenotypes. Stage-1 lines ranked high by GS had slightly inferior phenotypes in stage-2 trials than lines ranked high by phenotypes. Cost analysis indicated that replacing stage-1 phenotyping with GS would allow nearly three times more stage-1 candidates to be assessed and provide 0.84-2.23 times greater gain from selection. We conclude that GS can complement or replace phenotyping in early stages of phenotyping.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03613-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stage-1 lines
16
genomic selection
12
stage-1
10
lines
9
wheat breeding
8
gain selection
8
early stages
8
stages phenotyping
8
prediction accuracy
8
stage-1 phenotyping
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!