AI Article Synopsis

  • A study evaluated the impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging on diagnosing and managing infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with prosthetic (PV) and native valves (NV), involving 140 patients from 8 hospitals.
  • Before and after the imaging, experts assessed the patients' statuses using the modified Duke criteria, revealing that the imaging influenced the diagnosis, modifying classifications in 24.3% of PV and 5.7% of NV patients.
  • The management of care for some patients was also adjusted based on imaging findings, affecting 40% of cases, particularly benefiting those with inconclusive echocardiograms or classified as possible IE.

Article Abstract

Background: Diagnostic and patients' management modifications induced by whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT had not been evaluated so far in prosthetic valve (PV) or native valve (NV) infective endocarditis (IE)-suspected patients.

Methods: In sum, 140 consecutive patients in 8 tertiary care hospitals underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT. ESC-2015-modified Duke criteria and patients' management plan were established jointly by 2 experts before 18F-FDG-PET/CT. The same experts reestablished Duke classification and patients' management plan immediately after qualitative interpretation of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. A 6-month final Duke classification was established.

Results: Among the 70 PV and 70 NV patients, 34 and 46 were classified as definite IE before 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Abnormal perivalvular 18F-FDG uptake was recorded in 67.2% PV and 24.3% NV patients respectively (P < .001) and extracardiac uptake in 44.3% PV and 51.4% NV patients. IE classification was modified in 24.3% and 5.7% patients (P = .005) (net reclassification index 20% and 4.3%). Patients' managements were modified in 21.4% PV and 31.4% NV patients (P = .25). It was mainly due to perivalvular uptake in PV patients and to extra-cardiac uptake in NV patients and consisted in surgery plan modifications in 7 patients, antibiotic plan modifications in 22 patients and both in 5 patients. Altogether, 18F-FDG-PET/CT modified classification and/or care in 40% of the patients (95% confidence interval: 32-48), which was most likely to occur in those with a noncontributing echocardiography (P < .001) or IE classified as possible at baseline (P = .04), while there was no difference between NV and PV.

Conclusions: Systematic 18F-FDG-PET/CT did significantly and appropriately impact diagnostic classification and/or IE management in PV and NV-IE suspected patients.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02287792.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa666DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
13
patients' management
12
infective endocarditis
8
management plan
8
duke classification
8
uptake patients
8
plan modifications
8
modifications patients
8
classification and/or
8
18f-fdg-pet/ct
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!