Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provides reliable and reproducible estimates for assessment of cardiac structure and function after TAVR. The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to assess left ventricular (LV) volumes, mass and function by CMR after TAVR.
Methods: Using Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines, we searched PubMed and Embase for studies reporting CMR findings before and at least 1 month after TAVR. Main factors of interest were LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi), LV mass index (LVMi), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Standardized mean differences (SMD) were pooled by random effects meta-analytic techniques.
Results: Of 453 screened publications, 10 studies (published between 2012 and 2018) were included. A total of 305 patients completed pre- and post-TAVR follow-up CMR (mean age range 78.6-85.0 years, follow-up range 6-15 months). Random effects analysis showed TAVR resulted in reduced LVEDVi (SMD: -0.25, 95% CI: - 0.43 to - 0.07, P = 0.006), LVESVi (SMD: -0.24, 95% CI: - 0.44 to - 0.05, P = 0.01), LVMi (SMD: -0.82, 95% CI: - 1.0 to - 0.63, P < 0.001) and increased LVEF (SMD: 22, 95% CI: 6 to 38%, P = 0.006). Heterogeneity across studies was low (I: 0%, P > 0.05 for all). The median reduction was 4 ml/m (IQR: 3.1 to 8.2) for LVEDVi, 5 ml/m (IQR: 3.0 to 6.0) for LVESVi, and 15.1 g/m (IQR: 11.8 to 18.3) for LVMi. The median increase for LVEF was 3.4% (IQR 1.0 to 4.6%).
Conclusions: CMR demonstrates reverse LV remodeling occurrs within 6-15 months after TAVR, with reductions in LVEDVi, LVESVi and LVMi, and increased LVEF.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262773 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00629-9 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comparison of Outcomes Between Low-Risk Aortic Valve Replacement Trials and a Surgical Registry.
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Importance: It remains unknown whether outcomes of the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 3 (PARTNER 3) and Evolut Low Risk trials are comparable with surgical outcomes in nontrial settings, considering the added risk of concomitant cardiac operations.
Objective: To compare 30-day mortality and stroke incidences of patients in the surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) arm of low-risk trials with those of similar patients in the US Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS ACSD).
Design, Setting, And Participants: A cross-sectional sampling study was conducted of adults in the STS ACSD with severe aortic stenosis at low surgical risk for AVR who underwent SAVR during the years low-risk AVR trials (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk) were enrolling (calendar years 2016-2018).
Optimizing Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Addressing Cerebrovascular Complications and Enhancing Patient Safety.
Cardiol Rev
December 2024
From the Departments of Cardiology and Medicine, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, becoming the gold standard for many patients. Despite its advantages over surgical aortic valve replacement, TAVR is associated with significant complications, including paravalvular leakage, conduction disorders, and cerebrovascular events. This review focuses on the pathophysiology, incidence, and management of cerebrovascular complications following TAVR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFValve Thrombosis Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: State-of-the-Art Review.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established treatment for severe aortic stenosis, especially in patients over 75 or those at high surgical risk. While these prosthetic valves have a lower thrombogenic profile than mechanical heart valves, leaflet thrombosis in transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) occurs in an estimated 5%-40% of cases. Most TAV thromboses are subclinical and can be detected via cardiac computed tomography (CCT), which reveals hypo-attenuating leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion in asymptomatic patients without elevated transprosthetic gradients on echocardiography.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Impact of Cardiac Damage on In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the United States: An Analysis From The National Inpatient Sample.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
Introduction: The objective of this study is to determine if cardiac damage based on hospital discharge codes is associated with in-hospital outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospital admissions between 2016 and 2021 with a diagnosis of AS in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The cardiac damage stages 0-4 were determined based on hospital discharge codes.
Defining the cardiac surgical learning curve: a longitudinal cumulative analysis of a surgeon's experience and performance monitoring in the first decade of practice.
J Cardiothorac Surg
January 2025
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Background: Individual surgeons' learning curves are a crucial factor impacting patient outcomes. While many studies investigate procedure-specific learning curves, very few carried out a longitudinal analysis of individual cardiac surgeons over the course of their career. Given the evolving landscape of cardiac surgery with the introduction of transcatheter and robotic procedures, a contemporary evaluation of the cardiac surgical learning curve is justified and a method of personal performance monitoring is proposed in this study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!