Despite the divergent disease biology of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), wait-list prioritization is identical for both diagnoses. We compared wait-list and posttransplant outcomes between CCA and HCC liver transplantation patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exceptions using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. The 408 CCA candidates listed between 2003 and mid-2017 were matched to 2 HCC cohorts by listing date (±2 months, n = 816) and by Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) region and date (±6 months, n = 408). Cumulative incidence competing risk regression examined the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, and center-level CCA listing volume on wait-list removal due to death/being too ill (dropout). Cox models evaluated the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, center-level CCA volume, and waiting time on graft failure among deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. After adjusting for OPTN region and CCA listing volume (all P ≥ 0.07), both HCC cohorts had a reduced likelihood of wait-list dropout compared with CCA candidates (HCC with period matching only: subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P = 0.02 and HCC with OPTN region and period matching: SHR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.87; P = 0.007). The cumulative incidence rates of wait-list dropout at 6 and 12 months were 13.2% (95% CI, 10.0%-17.0%) and 23.9% (95% CI, 20.0%-29.0%) for CCA candidates, 7.3% (95% CI, 5.0%-10.0%) and 12.7% (95% CI, 10.0%-17.0%) for HCC candidates with region and listing date matching, and 7.1% (95% CI, 5.0%-9.0%) and 12.6% (95% CI, 10.0%-15.0%) for HCC candidates with listing date matching only. Additionally, HCC DDLT recipients had a 57% reduced risk of graft failure compared with CCA recipients (P < 0.001). Waiting time was unrelated to graft failure (P = 0.57), and there was no waiting time by diagnosis cohort interaction effect (P = 0.47). When identically prioritized, LT candidates with CCA have increased wait-list dropout compared with those with HCC. More granular data are necessary to discern ways to mitigate this wait-list disadvantage and improve survival for patients with CCA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.25807 | DOI Listing |
Liver Transpl
October 2024
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, USA.
Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database to compare the incidence of developing PTDM across the United States and develop a risk prediction model for new-onset PTDM using OPTN region as well as donor-related, recipient-related, and transplant-related factors. All US adult, primary, deceased donor, LTRs between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016, with no prior history of diabetes noted, were identified.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIBRO Neurosci Rep
December 2024
L&J Bio USA, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.
BMC Med Ethics
October 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Center for Academic Medicine, 453 Quarry Road, Room 267, MC 5661, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Background: The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) Final Rule guides national organ transplantation policies, mandating equitable organ allocation and organ-specific priority stratification systems. Current allocation scores rely on mortality predictions.
Methods: We examined the alignment between the ethical priorities across organ prioritization systems and the statistical design of the risk models in question.
J Heart Lung Transplant
January 2025
Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address:
Background: While structural socioeconomic inequity has been linked with inferior health outcomes, some have postulated reduced access to high-quality care to be the mediator. We assessed whether treatment at high-volume centers (HVC) would mitigate the adverse impact of area deprivation on heart transplantation (HT) outcomes.
Methods: All HT recipients ≥18 years were identified in the 2005-2022 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
September 2024
University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Connecticut, United States.
Background: Mortality after heart transplantation can be influenced by multiple factors. This study analyzed its variation across 4 regions of the United States.
Objective: Analyze the differences in mortality among patients receiving a heart transplant across 4 regions of the United States.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!