Noncoding RNAs versus Protein Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Disease.

Trends Mol Med

King's British Heart Foundation Centre, King's College London, 125 Coldharbour Lane, London SE5 9NU, UK. Electronic address:

Published: June 2020

The development of more sensitive protein biomarker assays results in continuous improvements in detectability, extending the range of clinical applications to the detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, these efforts have not yet led to improvements in risk assessment compared with existing risk scores. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been assessed as biomarkers, and miRNAs have attracted most attention. More recently, other ncRNA classes have been identified, including long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs). Here, we compare emerging ncRNA biomarkers in the cardiovascular field with protein biomarkers for their potential in clinical application, focusing on myocardial injury.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2020.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

noncoding rnas
12
protein biomarkers
8
biomarkers cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular disease
8
rnas versus
4
versus protein
4
biomarkers
4
disease development
4
development sensitive
4
sensitive protein
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!