Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: To establish a robust, individualized DNA repair-related gene signature to estimate prognosis for patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Materials And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed gene expression profiles of 541 localized ccRCC patients from two public ccRCC cohorts. The DNA repair-related gene pair index (DRPI) was constructed with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. The associations between DRPI, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate analysis, and multivariate Cox regression survival analysis. We compared the predictive accuracy of different risk models with Harrel's C-index.
Results: In the primary univariate analysis, patients in DRPI-high-risk group had significantly shorter OS [P < 0.001, HR (95% CI) 2.093 (1.431-3.061)] and DSS [P < 0.001, HR (95% CI) 3.567 (2.017-6.339)]. After adjusted for stage and grade, DRPI-high-risk group remained an independent adverse risk factor for both OS [P = 0.026, HR (95% CI) 1.629 (1.094-2.452)] and DSS [P = 0.010, HR (95% CI) 2.209 (1.217-4.010)]. DPRI showed comparable predictive accuracy with cell cycle proliferation (CCP) score and ccA/ccB signature. Copy number alterations and tumor mutation burden were enriched in DRPI-high tumors. There were elevated number of Treg cells and higher T cell exhaustion marker expression in DRPI-high-risk tumors. The combined DNA repair-clinical score outperformed other risk models in terms of C-index.
Conclusion: We validated the proposed DRPI as a predictor of clinical outcome in localized ccRCC patients. It provides an individualized and more accurate risk assessment beyond clinicopathological characteristics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03270-4 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!