Gastric cancer in young patients: a separate entity with aggressive features and poor prognosis.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

Digestive Disease Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, China.

Published: November 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on comparing clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in young (18-49 years), middle-aged (50-59 years), and older (60+ years) gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery.
  • Young patients showed a higher proportion of aggressive tumor characteristics but had worse overall and disease-free survival rates compared to middle-aged patients, while performing better than older patients.
  • The research indicates that being young is an independent negative prognostic factor for gastric cancer, suggesting that young patients may need more targeted management due to their poorer outcomes.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between young and old patients with gastric cancer (GC), and further determine the role of young age in the prognosis of GC.

Methods: Patients with stage I-III gastric adenocarcinomas undergoing curative surgery were enrolled, divided into young (aged 18-49 years, YG), middle-aged (50-59 years, MG), and old (≥ 60 years, OG) groups. Exclusion criteria were neoadjuvant therapy and history of malignant tumors. Clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence patterns were compared among three groups.

Results: 1131 patients were finally included, with 270, 314, and 547 cases in the YG, MG, and OG, respectively. Compared to others, YG had higher proportion of female, middle-third gastric cancer, poor differentiation, N3b stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. YG demonstrated poorer 5-year OS than MG (62.4% vs. 70.8%, P = 0.019), but better than OG (62.4% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.031). YG also suffered inferior 5-year DFS (75.2% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.040) compared with MG, and higher incidence of peritoneal recurrence than MG (15.1% vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001) and OG (15.1% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified young age as the independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.347, 95% CI 1.018-1.781, P = 0.037], DFS (HR = 1.601, 95% CI 1.079-2.376, P = 0.019), and peritoneal recurrence (HR = 2.936, 95% CI 1.505-5.726, P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Young GC patients demonstrated aggressive features with poor prognosis and enhanced management may be warranted for this subgroup.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03268-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gastric cancer
12
young patients
8
clinicopathological features
8
features survival
8
compared higher
8
gastric
4
young
4
cancer young
4
patients
4
patients separate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!