AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compared two treatments for a blood clot condition called iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IfDVT): percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and thrombolysis alone (THR).
  • Researchers looked at various studies from 2001 to 2019, finding out how well each treatment worked and any safety issues they had.
  • The results showed that PMT had better long-term success and caused fewer major bleeding problems compared to THR, but they still need to think about some risks from PMT treatment.

Article Abstract

This study sought to compare effectiveness and safety of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and thrombolysis alone (THR) in patients with acute or subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IfDVT). Observational and randomized trials, published between January 2001 to February 2019 were identified by searching MEDLINE. Studies on deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated with either THR or PMT adjunctive to conventional anticoagulation and compressive intervention were included. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to assess effectiveness outcomes of successful lysis and primary patency, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), valvular reflux, recurrent DVT, as well as safety outcomes of major bleeding, hematuria, and pulmonary embolism. Of 77 identified records, 17 studies including 1417 patients were eligible. Pooled proportion of successful lysis was similar between groups (THR: 95 % [I = 68.4 %], PMT 96 %, [I = 0 %]; Q [Cochran's Q between groups] 0.3, p = 0.61). However, pooled proportion of 6-month primary patency was lower after THR than after PMT (68 % [I = 15.6 %] versus 94 %; Q 26.4, p < 0.001). Considerable heterogeneity within groups did not allow for between-group comparison of PTS and recurrent DVT. Major bleeding was more frequent after THR than after PMT (6.0 % [I = 0 %] versus 1.0 % [I = 0 %]; Q 12.3, p < 0.001). Incidence of hematuria was lower after THR as compared to PMT (2 % [I = 56 %] versus 91.3 % [I = 91.7 %]; Q 714, p < 0.001). Incidences of valvular reflux and pulmonary embolism were similar across groups (THR: 61 % versus PMT: 53 %; Q 0.7, p = 0.39 and THR: 2 % versus PMT: 1 %; Q 1.1, p = 0.30, respectively). In patients with iliofemoral DVT, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was associated with a higher cumulative 6-month primary patency and a lower incidence of major bleeding compared to thrombolysis alone. Risk of hemolysis from mechanical thrombectomy needs further consideration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000875DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical thrombectomy
8
iliofemoral deep
8
deep vein
8
vein thrombosis
8
thr pmt
8
successful lysis
8
primary patency
8
pooled proportion
8
endovascular mechanical
4
thrombectomy versus
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!