A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracic Surgery Leads to Rapid Recovery From Anesthesia. | LitMetric

Use of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracic Surgery Leads to Rapid Recovery From Anesthesia.

Ann Thorac Surg

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address:

Published: October 2020

Background: Ultrasound guidance has resulted in a continuous evolution in techniques for pain control for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The objective of this study was to compare erector spinae plane block with intercostal block as multimodal analgesia to elucidate quality of postoperative pain control and preservation of pulmonary function after VATS.

Methods: A consecutive cohort of patients undergoing elective VATS was enrolled in the study and divided into erector spinae plane block and intercostal block groups. Spirometry and visual analog scale pain score exams were performed to measure forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV), FEV/FVC ratio, and forced expiratory flow in intervals of 25% to 75%. Chronic pain was assessed by reviewing surgical follow-up notes.

Results: Seventy-eight patients were included. Comparing the erector spinae plane block group with the intercostal block group found significant improvement in visual analog scale pain score (3.2 vs 6.4, P < .001), postanesthesia care unit length of stay (127.3 vs 189.5 minutes, P = .045), preservation in lung volume parameters at 2 hours (FVC: 40.5% vs 51.4%, P < .001; FEV: 40.9% vs 53.8%, P < .001; and forced expiratory flow in intervals of 25%-75%: 39.7% vs 53.7%, P = .019) and at 24 hours (FVC: 37.8% vs 50.5%, P < .001; FEV: 34.3% vs 51.9%, P < .001; forced expiratory flow in intervals of 25%-75%: 27.1% vs 56.3%, P < .001), respectively.

Conclusions: Erector spinae plane block improves acute and chronic pain control and preserves lung function. Thus, it has the potential for enhanced recovery from VATS as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.117DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

erector spinae
20
spinae plane
20
plane block
20
forced expiratory
16
pain control
12
intercostal block
12
expiratory flow
12
flow intervals
12
block
8
block intercostal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!