A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Pain inhibition is not affected by exercise-induced pain. | LitMetric

Pain inhibition is not affected by exercise-induced pain.

Pain Rep

Department of Health Sciences, Academic Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.

Published: March 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Offset analgesia (OA) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are important methods for studying how the body manages pain, but their sensitivity to acute pain from exercise is not well understood.
  • A study with 42 healthy adults tested the effects of a single intense exercise on OA and CPM, measuring pain sensitivity at both a local site (lower back) and a remote site (forearm) across three appointments.
  • Results indicated that while exercise led to some muscle soreness and pain perception, it did not significantly affect OA or CPM at either site, suggesting these paradigms may need more intense pain stimuli to show modulation.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Offset analgesia (OA) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are frequently used paradigms to assess the descending pain modulation system. Recently, it was shown that both paradigms are reduced in chronic pain, but the influence of acute pain has not yet been adequately examined.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate OA and CPM after exercise-induced pain to evaluate whether these tests can be influenced by delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) at a local or remote body site.

Methods: Forty-two healthy adults were invited to 3 separate examination days: a baseline appointment, the consecutive day, and 7 days later. Participants were randomly divided into a rest (n = 21) and an exercise group (n = 21). The latter performed a single intensive exercise for the lower back. Before, immediately after, and on the following examination days, OA and CPM were measured at the forearm and the lower back by blinded assessor.

Results: The exercise provoked a moderate pain perception and a mild delayed-onset muscle soreness on the following day. Repeated-measurements analysis of variance showed no statistically significant main effect for either OA or CPM at the forearm or lower back ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: Delayed-onset muscle soreness was shown to have no effect on the inhibitory pain modulation system neither locally (at the painful body part), nor remotely. Thus, OA and CPM are robust test paradigms that probably require more intense, different, or prolonged pain to be modulated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209813PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000817DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pain modulation
12
delayed-onset muscle
12
muscle soreness
12
pain
10
exercise-induced pain
8
modulation system
8
examination days
8
forearm lower
8
cpm
5
pain inhibition
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!