Objective: To screen for a high risk of preeclampsia in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods: A total of 513 antenatal care records of pregnant patients with SLE were obtained, and the data were randomly assigned to either a development set (n = 342) or a validation set (n = 171). Preeclampsia predictors were identified with stepwise regression, and a coefficient B of each variable was used to establish a prediction model and risk scoring system. Goodness-of-fit was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow and Omnibus tests, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve) was used to assess discrimination. Validation was performed using the validation set.
Results: The preeclampsia incidence was 14.4% in the pregnant patients with SLE. A mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥96.5 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 213.15 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 24.39-999.99]), prepregnancy hypertension (OR 18.19 [95% CI 2.67-125.01]), a hematologic disorder (OR 4.13 [95% CI 1.03-16.67]), positive IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (aCLs) (OR 19.85 [95% CI 1.11-333.33]), serum albumin <31.5 grams/liter (OR 9.88 [95% CI 2.07-47.62]), serum uric acid ≥303 μmoles/liter (OR 5.58 [95% CI 1.40-22.22]), and 24-hour urinary protein ≥0.286 grams (OR 14.39 [95% CI 2.43-83.33]) were selected for the preeclampsia prediction model. The area under the curve was 0.975. Preeclampsia prediction model scores >4 indicated a high risk of preeclampsia. For the validation set, the preeclampsia prediction accuracy was 93.6% (sensitivity 88.5%, specificity 94.5%).
Conclusion: A model for predicting the risk of preeclampsia in pregnant patients with SLE was established on the basis of MAP, prepregnancy hypertension, hematologic disorders, IgM aCLs, albumin, uric acid, and 24-hour urinary protein. The model had good predictive efficiency and can help clinicians improve pregnancy outcomes in high-risk women with early interventions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24265 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The Research Agenda for Perinatal Innovation and Digital Health Project: Human-Centered Approach to Multipartner Research Agenda Codevelopment.
JMIR Hum Factors
January 2025
Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Background: Digital health innovations provide an opportunity to improve access to care, information, and quality of care during the perinatal period, a critical period of health for mothers and infants. However, research to develop perinatal digital health solutions needs to be informed by actual patient and health system needs in order to optimize implementation, adoption, and sustainability.
Objective: Our aim was to co-design a research agenda with defined research priorities that reflected health system realities and patient needs.
Characteristics and determinants of quality non-directive pregnancy options counselling: a scoping review.
Sex Health
January 2025
Griffith University School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, Qld 4122, Australia.
Non-directive pregnancy options counselling (POC) is a core component of comprehensive reproductive health care for pregnant people wanting support in making a pregnancy outcome decision. Approximately one quarter of people with unintended pregnancies and people seeking abortion care seek POC. This study synthesises global evidence on access to and characteristics of quality non-directive POC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMaternal and Infant Outcomes in a Subset of Patients with Sickle Cell Disease in South Carolina.
South Med J
February 2025
the Department of Public Health Sciences.
Objectives: Sickle cell disease (SCD), which disproportionately affects minorities, increases complications during pregnancy. Severe maternal mortality is increased in women with SCD, including morbidity related to the disease and other nondisease-related complications. It also can have devastating complications for fetuses, with increases in premature birth and low birth weight.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFManagement of adhesive small bowel obstruction during pregnancy in the United States.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
January 2025
From the Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.J.A., V.C., E.L., N.K., M.J.M., K.I., K. Matsushima), Los Angeles General Medical Center, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K. Matsuo), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Background: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a rare, nonobstetrical abdominal emergency. Optimal management of ASBO during pregnancy remains unknown. This study analyzes management trends and outcomes of pregnant patients with ASBO in the United States.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGaining stakeholder perspectives to shape a produce prescription program to improve maternal and birth outcomes: a qualitative study.
Front Public Health
January 2025
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Introduction: Nutrition during pregnancy significantly impacts maternal and birth outcomes. A key factor contributing to the rise in adverse maternal and birth outcomes is poor nutrition. Produce prescription programs have the potential to address pregnancy-related adverse outcomes such as hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes, but scientific evidence is limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!