A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Electronic Spillover from a Metallic Nanoparticle: Can Simple Electrochemical Electron Transfer Processes Be Catalyzed by Electronic Coupling of a Molecular Scale Gold Nanoparticle Simultaneously to the Redox Molecule and the Electrode? | LitMetric

Electrochemical electron transfer (ET) of transition metal complexes or redox metalloproteins can be catalyzed by more than an order of magnitude by molecular scale metallic nanoparticles (NPs), often rationalized by concentration enhancement of the redox molecules in the interfacial region, but collective electronic AuNP array effects have also been forwarded. Using DFT combined with molecular electrochemical ET theory we explore here whether a single molecular scale Au nanocluster (AuC) between a Au (111) surface and the molecular redox probe ferrocene/ferricinium (Fc/Fc) can trigger an ET rate increase. Computational challenges limit us to AuCs ( up to 147), which are smaller than most electrocatalytic AuCs studied experimentally. AuC-coating thiols are addressed both as adsorption of two S atoms at the structural Au bridge sites and as superexchange of variable-size AuCs via a single six-carbon alkanethiyl bridge. Our results are guiding, but enable comparing many AuC surface details (apex, ridge, face, direct vs superexchange ET) with a planar Au(111) surface. The rate-determining electronic transmission coefficients for ET between Fc/Fc and AuC are highly sensitive to subtle AuC electronic features. The transmission coefficients mostly compete poorly with direct Fc/Fc ET at the Au(111) surface, but Fc/Fc 100 face-bound on Au and Au and ridge bound on Au leads to a 2- or 3-fold rate enhancement, in different distance ranges. Single AuCs can thus indeed cause rate enhancement of simple electrochemical ET, but additional, possibly collective AuNC effects, as well as larger clusters and more complete coating layers, also need to be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b09362DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

molecular scale
12
simple electrochemical
8
electrochemical electron
8
electron transfer
8
au111 surface
8
transmission coefficients
8
rate enhancement
8
electronic
5
molecular
5
electronic spillover
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!