To explore the difference of perfusion parameters between gastric cancer (GC) and gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) by using oral contrast plus contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (OC+CEUS). We retrospectively reviewed 149 patients with histologically confirmed gastric lesions (80 patients with GC and 69 patients with GST). OC+CEUS was performed in all patients in the GC group and the GST group before surgery. The cine loops of OC+CEUS of all cases were analyzed. The perfusion parameters including arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP), basal intensity (BI), and peak intensity (PI) were obtained via a program designed for autotracking contrast quantification (ACQ). The between-group differences in these parameters were compared. According to time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, high-risk GST had higher PI than low-risk GST ( < 0.05). GC had faster AT and higher PI than normal gastric wall ( < 0.05); GST had higher PI than normal gastric wall ( < 0.05). Furthermore, the GC group had faster AT and higher PI than the GST group ( < 0.05). In contrast, the difference in BI and peak time (TTP) between the groups was not significant ( > 0.05). AT and PI differ significantly between the GC group and the GST group. As a new method, OC+CEUS has value for the differential diagnosis of GC and GST.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7214801PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00532DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perfusion parameters
12
gst group
12
difference perfusion
8
parameters gastric
8
gastric cancer
8
cancer gastric
8
gastric stromal
8
stromal tumors
8
oral contrast
8
contrast contrast-enhanced
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!