AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the use of point of care tests (POCT) for diagnosing malaria and anaemia in pregnant women in Ghana, focusing on the barriers and enablers for effective implementation.
  • POCT is seen as a valuable, cost-effective alternative to laboratory tests, but reliance on symptom-based diagnosis persists due to inconsistent access.
  • The findings reveal that while POCT is valued for its user-friendliness and potential for better patient outcomes, there are concerns about accuracy and the possibility of missing mild cases of anaemia.

Article Abstract

Background: Anaemia and malaria are both major contributors to maternal and child mortality, and morbidity, with some of the worst outcomes occurring in sub-Saharan Africa. Point of care tests (POCT), if used appropriately, provide a simple, inexpensive form of diagnostic testing, as a reliable alternative when laboratory tests are not readily available. In such resource limited settings, clinical staff tend to rely on symptom-based diagnosis and presumptive treatment. This study uses qualitative methods to identify the current practice of POCT use for malaria and anaemia, to explore the enablers and barriers to effective implementation of these POCT, and to determine how relationships between each of the stakeholder groups may impact on POCT use.

Methods: Staff (clinical and laboratory) and patients (pregnant women) at three antenatal care facilities within the Ashanti Region of Ghana participated in interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). An initial coding framework was developed based on the pre-defined objectives of the study. Thematic analysis was used to identify subthemes and categories within each of the key themes.

Results: At the time data were collected all three facilities used malaria POCT either as an adjunct to microscopy, or as their only form of malaria testing. Although all three facilities were familiar with haemoglobin colour scale (HCS), none of the facilities used them routinely. Clinical staff perceived symptom-based diagnosis was a quick way to diagnosis because access to POCT during consultations was unreliable, but recognized disadvantages associated with symptom-based diagnosis. Perceived advantages of malaria and anaemia POCT were user-friendliness, improved diagnosis and opportunity for patient engagement, as well as lower cost implication for patients. Perceived disadvantages included likelihood of missed diagnosis of mild anaemia, as well as likelihood of human error leading to in accurate diagnosis which could impact on patient trust. Poor communication and lack of trust between staff groups was also identified as a barrier to effective uptake of POCT.

Conclusions: Consistent supply of POCT as well as staff training and staff and patient engagement, are fundamental to successful uptake of POCT for effective malaria and anaemia management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238731PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05274-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

malaria anaemia
16
symptom-based diagnosis
12
poct
9
point care
8
care tests
8
clinical staff
8
three facilities
8
patient engagement
8
malaria
7
diagnosis
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!