Highly Hydrophilic Polyurethane Foam Dressing Versus Early Hydrophilic Polyurethane Foam Dressing on Skin Graft Donor Site Healing in Patients with Diabetes: An Exploratory Clinical Trial.

Adv Skin Wound Care

In the Department of Plastic Surgery at Korea University College of Medicine, in Seoul, South Korea, Sik Namgoong, MD, PhD, is Clinical Assistant Professor; Jae-Eun Jung, MD, is a resident; Young-Don Yoon, MD, is a resident; and Seung-Kyu Han, MD, PhD, is Professor. In the Department of Nursing Service at Korea University Guro Hospital in Seoul, South Korea, Ye-Na Lee, MSc, RN, WCN, and Ji-Won Son, RN, WCN, are wound care nurses. Acknowledgment: This study was supported by grants from Il-Dong Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, South Korea (No. I1500851). The authors have disclosed no other financial relationships related to this article. Submitted April 21, 2019; accepted in revised form July 9, 2019.

Published: June 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare early hydrophilic polyurethane (EHP) foam dressing and highly hydrophilic polyurethane (HHP) foam dressing effects on wound healing in diabetic patients.
  • Conducted with 20 diabetic patients who had skin graft donor sites, results showed that healing was significantly faster with HHP dressings (17.2 days) compared to EHP dressings (19.6 days).
  • No adverse effects were reported for either dressing, suggesting HHP foam could be more effective for promoting faster healing in diabetic skin graft donor sites.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of early hydrophilic polyurethane (EHP) foam dressing and highly hydrophilic polyurethane (HHP) foam dressing on wound healing in patients with diabetes.

Methods: Twenty patients with diabetes with skin graft donor sites on the lateral thigh were enrolled in this study. Each donor site was divided into two equal-sized areas for the application of HHP or EHP foam dressing. The study endpoint was the time required for healing, defined as complete epithelialization of the donor site without discharge. All possible adverse events were also documented.

Main Results: Donor site healing was faster in 15 patients on the HHP half and 1 patient on the EHP half. In four patients, healing rates were the same between the HHP and EHP areas. Donor sites treated with HHP and EHP foam dressings healed in 17.2 ± 4.4 and 19.6 ± 3.7 days (P = .007), respectively. During the study period, no adverse event associated with the dressings occurred in either group.

Conclusions: The HHP foam dressing might provide faster healing than EHP foam dressing for skin graft donor sites in patients with diabetes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000661792.04223.02DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foam dressing
28
hydrophilic polyurethane
16
donor site
16
ehp foam
16
skin graft
12
graft donor
12
patients diabetes
12
donor sites
12
hhp ehp
12
highly hydrophilic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!