Agricultural Safety Education: Formative Assessment of a Curriculum Integration Strategy.

J Agric Saf Health

Michael L. Pate, Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania; Rebecca G. Lawver, Associate Professor, Department of Applied Sciences, Technology, and Education, Utah State University, Logan, Utah; Scott W. Smalley, Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Education and Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa; Dustin K. Perry, Assistant Professor, Division of Agricultural Education, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana; Lorann Stallones, Professor and Director, Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado; Alyx Shultz, Associate Professor, Hutson School of Agriculture, Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky.

Published: February 2019

The purpose of this study was to assess an agricultural tractor and machinery safety curriculum for teacher training that focused on hands-on integration activities to assist with training youth in machinery safety skills. Teachers attended a single ten-hour summer training seminar hosted in Montana, South Dakota, or Utah during 2017. Teachers completed the National Tractor and Machinery Safe Operation (NSTMOP) exam to measure their existing knowledge prior to beginning the training. Upon seminar completion, teachers took an NSTMOP post-test to measure their knowledge gain of agricultural safety practices and hazard recognition associated with machinery and tractors. A total of 116 teachers completed the training. Fifty-three participants (45.7%) identified as female, and 63 (54.3%) identified as male. The average participant was 35 years old (SD = 11.3) and had 9.5 years of teaching experience (SD = 9.2). The average NSTMOP pre-test score was 35.2 out of 48 (SD = 3.3), and the average NSTMOP post-test score was 40.3 out of 48 (SD = 4.1). Participants' scores increased by ten percentage points. A paired-samples t-test was used to determine statistical significance. The difference between pre-test and post-test was significant (t(109) = 11.9, p < 0.001). Open responses indicated continuation of hands-on activities that focused on "how to teach" skills training that is relevant to the students. Teachers suggested developing new activities each year with a rotation of topics for upcoming seminars. Research is needed to determine the training's influence on the behaviors of young workers in agriculture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7233796PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/jash.13113DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agricultural safety
8
tractor machinery
8
machinery safety
8
training seminar
8
teachers completed
8
nstmop post-test
8
average nstmop
8
training
6
teachers
5
safety education
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!