AI Article Synopsis

  • Postpartum depression (PPD) affects 17% of mothers and can have negative impacts on both mothers and their babies; this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various psychological interventions in preventing PPD through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  • The systematic review will analyze studies involving pregnant women or new mothers who were not depressed at the start, comparing those who received psychological interventions to those who received standard care across multiple databases until January 2020.
  • The analysis will assess study quality, determine any biases, and analyze variability between studies using various statistical methods, with findings expected to be disseminated following ethical standards.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) is 17%, and the incidence is 12% worldwide. Adverse consequences for mothers and babies have been associated with this disease. To assess the effectiveness of psychological, psychoeducational and psychosocial interventions in preventing PPD, a systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) will be conducted.

Methods And Analysis: A SR/MA will be performed following the indications of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies will be identified through MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, OpenGrey, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov and evidencebasedtherapy.org from inception until 31 January 2020. Bridging searches will be also conducted until the review is completed. The selection criteria will be as follows: (1) subjects will be pregnant females or females who have given birth in the last 12 months and who were non-depressive at baseline; (2) psychological, psychoeducational and psychosocial interventions; (3) comparator will be usual care, attention control, waiting list or no intervention; (4) outcomes will be specific results on PPD; and (5) the design of the studies will be randomised controlled trials. No restrictions regarding the year of publication, the setting of the intervention or the language of publication will be considered. Pooled standardised mean differences and 95% CIs will be calculated. The risk of bias of the studies will be assessed through the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Heterogeneity between the studies will be determined by the I and Cochran's Q statistics. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses will also be performed. Publication bias will be checked with funnel plots and Egger's test. Heterogeneity will be explored by random-effects meta-regression analysis.

Ethics And Dissemination: The ethical assessment was not required. The results will be presented at conferences and disseminated through publications.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42018109981.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239544PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034424DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

will
17
studies will
16
psychological psychoeducational
12
psychoeducational psychosocial
12
psychosocial interventions
12
controlled trials
12
effectiveness psychological
8
postpartum depression
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!