AI Article Synopsis

  • Agitated patients present challenges for both emergency medical services (EMS) provider safety and patient care, and midazolam is often used to manage these situations, though data on its use outside hospitals is limited.
  • A retrospective review in a large urban EMS system from 2014 to 2016 analyzed the effectiveness of administering midazolam for acute agitation, utilizing different routes of administration (IV, IM, IN) and collecting data on outcomes and side effects.
  • Results indicated that midazolam effectively reduced agitation in 73.5% of cases with low adverse effects (3.4%), and no significant difference was found between the effectiveness of IM and IN administration.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Agitated patients in the prehospital setting pose challenges for both patient care and emergency medical services (EMS) provider safety. Midazolam is frequently used to control agitation in the emergency department setting; however, limited data exist in the prehospital setting. We describe our experience treating patients with midazolam for behavioral emergencies in a large urban EMS system. We hypothesized that using midazolam for acute agitation leads to improved clinical conditions without causing significant clinical deterioration.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of EMS patient care reports following implementation of a behavioral emergencies protocol in a large urban EMS system from February 2014-June 2016. For acute agitation, paramedics administered midazolam 1 milligram (mg) intravenous (IV), 5 mg intramuscular (IM), or 5 mg intranasal (IN). Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Levene's test for assessing variance among study groups, and t-test to evaluate effectiveness based on route.

Results: In total, midazolam was administered 294 times to 257 patients. Median age was 30 (interquartile range 24-42) years, and 66.5% were male. Doses administered were 1 mg (7.1%) and 5 mg (92.9%). Routes were IM (52.0%), IN (40.8%), and IV (7.1%). A second dose was administered to 37 patients. In the majority of administrations, midazolam improved the patient's condition (73.5%) with infrequent adverse events (3.4%). There was no significant difference between the effectiveness of IM and IN midazolam (71.0% vs 75.4%; p = 0.24).

Conclusion: A midazolam protocol for prehospital agitation was associated with reduced agitation and a low rate of adverse events.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234702PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45552DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

behavioral emergencies
12
midazolam
9
midazolam protocol
8
protocol prehospital
8
prehospital setting
8
patient care
8
large urban
8
urban ems
8
ems system
8
acute agitation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!