Good evidence exists that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays an important role in degradation of mitochondrial proteins and membrane proteins associated with mitochondria (MAM proteins). Mitochondria contain all components of the ubiquitin-conjugating system, which are necessary for the attachment of ubiquitin molecules to target proteins, subjected to subsequent degradation in proteasomes. An important stage in the delivery of proteins for proteolytic degradation in proteasomes is their interaction with ubiquitin receptors located on the regulatory subunit (19S) of the proteasome: the Rpn10 or Rpn13 subunit. These subunits make basically the same contribution to the subsequent translocation of target proteins to the core part of the proteasome. A comparative study of mouse brain mitochondrial subproteomes bound to Rpn10 and Rpn13 subunits revealed a high specificity of the repertoire of Rpn10 and Rpn13-binding proteins. Moreover, proteins, for which mitochondrial localization or association with mitochondrial membranes was previously shown, prevailed in the case of using the Rpn13 subunit as an affinity ligand (Rpn13-binding proteins). This suggests that Rpn10 and Rpn13 play different roles in the degradation of mitochondrial proteins and MAM.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.18097/PBMC20206602138 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The Structural Role of RPN10 in the 26S Proteasome and an RPN2-Binding Residue on RPN13 Are Functionally Important in Arabidopsis.
Int J Mol Sci
October 2024
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
The ubiquitin receptors RPN10 and RPN13 harbor multiple activities including ubiquitin binding; however, solid evidence connecting a particular activity to specific in vivo functions is scarce. Through complementation, the ubiquitin-binding site-truncated Arabidopsis RPN10 (N215) rescued the growth defects of , supporting the idea that the ubiquitin-binding ability of RPN10 is dispensable and N215, which harbors a vWA domain, is fully functional. Instead, a structural role played by RPN10 in the 26S proteasomes is likely vital in vivo.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProteasome condensate formation is driven by multivalent interactions with shuttle factors and ubiquitin chains.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
March 2024
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160.
Stress conditions can cause the relocalization of proteasomes to condensates in yeast and mammalian cells. The interactions that facilitate the formation of proteasome condensates, however, are unclear. Here, we show that the formation of proteasome condensates in yeast depends on ubiquitin chains together with the proteasome shuttle factors Rad23 and Dsk2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnlabelled: Stress conditions can cause the relocalization of proteasomes to condensates in yeast and mammalian cells. The interactions that facilitate the formation of proteasome condensates, however, are unclear. Here, we show that the formation of proteasome condensates in yeast depends on long K48-linked ubiquitin chains together with the proteasome shuttle factors Rad23 and Dsk2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUbiquitin-Like protein 5 interacts with the silencing suppressor p3 of rice stripe virus and mediates its degradation through the 26S proteasome pathway.
PLoS Pathog
August 2020
State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of MOA of China and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, China.
Ubiquitin like protein 5 (UBL5) interacts with other proteins to regulate their function but differs from ubiquitin and other UBLs because it does not form covalent conjugates. Ubiquitin and most UBLs mediate the degradation of target proteins through the 26S proteasome but it is not known if UBL5 can also do that. Here we found that the UBL5s of rice and Nicotiana benthamiana interacted with rice stripe virus (RSV) p3 protein.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTightening the Crosslinking Distance Restraints for Better Resolution of Protein Structure and Dynamics.
Structure
October 2020
CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance at Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430071, China; Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430074, China; Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, and Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Electronic address:
Chemical crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry (CXMS) has been increasingly used in structural biology. CXMS distance restraints are usually applied to Cα or Cβ atoms of the crosslinked residues, with upper bounds typically over 20 Å. The incorporation of loose CXMS restraints only marginally improves the resolution of the calculated structures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!