Background: The critical shoulder angle (CSA) has been associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tears both in the presence and absence of glenohumeral arthritis. It is unclear whether the CSA can be reliably measured from plain radiographs of concentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis amongst examiners at differing levels of training.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The CSA was measured on a standardized AP scapular view at baseline and then 4 weeks later by fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons, a shoulder fellow and a senior orthopaedic resident. Grade of arthritis was categorized using the Samilson and Prieto method. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was then determined for all examiners, as well as for increasing severity of radiographic arthritis. The relationship between the CSA and grade of arthritis was assessed.

Results: There were 166 included patients comprised of 104 females (63%) and 62 males (37%) with a mean age of 65.9 ± 10.4 years. The inter- and intra-observer reliability for measuring the CSA amongst all examiners was found to be excellent, with an intra-class coefficient (ICC) of >0.9 (p < 0.0001). The ICC remained excellent even amongst radiographs with more advanced arthritis. Furthermore, there was a weak, inverse relationship between the grade of arthritis and the CSA (r = -0.377, p < 0.005).

Conclusion: The CSA can reliably be measured by examiners at varying levels of orthopaedic training, even with more advanced radiographic glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Level of evidence: Level III (Prognostic).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215095PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.04.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glenohumeral osteoarthritis
12
critical shoulder
8
shoulder angle
8
angle csa
8
grade arthritis
8
inter- intra-observer
8
intra-observer reliability
8
csa
6
glenohumeral
4
csa glenohumeral
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of the shoulder complicate approximately 0.7% of primary and 15.4% of revision shoulder arthroplasties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Mobilization of the subscapularis muscle (SSC) is crucial for optimal access to the glenohumeral joint during anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA). However, the ideal mobilization technique remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of the lesser tuberosity C-block osteotomy, a modified lesser tuberosity osteotomy, on the postoperative subscapularis (SSC) volume following anatomical shoulder arthroplasty and compare it to the volume of the infraspinatus/teres minor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In terms of rotator cuff repair, there is a goal for complete repair and healing, as rotator cuff integrity correlates with clinical and functional results. Retear has been shown to have a significant influence on progression toward osteoarthritis, and patients with an intact supraspinatus show superior abduction and flexion strength. However, in cases where complete repair may not be possible and/or cost limitations may prohibit augmentation, partial repair can provide a respectable outcome.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Although mixing and matching components is a common, safe, and well-documented practice in hip revision surgery, our extensive search indicates that it has not been previously reported for shoulder arthroplasty. This case report presents the use of mixed implants in shoulder revision surgery to reduce morbidity and address flaws in the initial implant design. We describe a case of a patient with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia who was treated for osteoarthritis in his left shoulder with an anatomic shoulder replacement in 2014.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The optimal treatment for B2 glenoid morphology in young, active osteoarthritis patients is debated, with various options like hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and reverse TSA available, each having pros and cons.
  • Eccentric glenoid reaming can be effective but risks damaging the bone structure, potentially complicating future surgeries, while bone grafting, though beneficial for some, comes with high complication rates.
  • Reverse TSA offers a more stable alternative when correcting version and inclination proves difficult, as it adapts better to glenoid deformities and maintains functionality with reduced bone stock.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!