Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality despite advances in the field of critical care, including growing implementation of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) support. The primary aim of this study was to present complications during transport on V-V ECMO support from regional hospitals to a tertiary center. The secondary goal was to identify initial laboratory and demographic data differentiating survivors and non-survivors.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, case-series study. We extracted data from the hospital's ECMO database from March 2016 to June 2019. Patients' diagnosis at admission, baseline demographics, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) scoring systems, laboratory parameters at admission, duration of ECMO therapy and mechanical ventilation time, and the patient survival rate until the ICU discharge were analyzed.

Results: We assessed 31 patients retrieved from regional intensive care units. All analyzed transports on V-V ECMO were performed by an ambulance and median distance and transport time were 100 kilometers and 70 minutes, respectively. Minor complications during the transport were reported in 10 cases (32.25%). The mean V-V ECMO support time was 6.56 days and survival rate until the patient discharge was 64.51%. We found higher body mass index (33.5 vs. 26.5, P = 0.00251) and lower serum lactate level (1.25 vs. 1.6, P = 0.0058) at V-V ECMO initiation to correlate with higher survival rates.

Conclusions: The transport of patients on V-V ECMO support appears to be safe and feasible. Further studies are needed to identify the specific clinical conditions which might affect the final outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176519PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.94501DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

v-v ecmo
24
ecmo support
20
ecmo
11
complications transport
8
survival rate
8
v-v
6
support
5
transportation patients
4
patients severe
4
severe respiratory
4

Similar Publications

The superiority of veno-arterial over veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for operative support of lung transplantation.

BMC Pulm Med

January 2025

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.

Background: Veno-arterial (V-A) and veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are crucial support modalities during lung transplantation, yet their comparative effectiveness remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted an 8-year retrospective analysis of 62 lung transplant recipients who received intraoperative ECMO (29 V-A, 33 V-V). Baseline characteristics, surgical parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lung Transplant Success in COVID-19 Patients Requiring V-V ECMO: One-Year Follow-Up.

Ann Transplant

December 2024

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine, and Physiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

BACKGROUND Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) can result in severe disease requiring mechanical ventilatory support. A subset of these patients, however, demonstrate refractory hypoxemia/hypercarbia requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) as adjunctive therapy. The primary goal of V-V ECMO is a "bridge" to recovery of native lung function; however, patients may progress to irreversible pulmonary damage requiring lung transplantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Perioperative airway management and oxygenation maintenance during central airway obstruction (CAO) treatment pose great challenges. While veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) shows promise as a bridge therapy, optimal implementation and management strategies remain lacking. We present our experience with V-V ECMO in CAO management from a high-volume center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neurological complications in patients undergoing veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) are challenging, with new intracranial pathologies posing a grave risk. We aimed to evaluate the utility of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B biomarkers for predicting outcomes in new-onset intracranial pathology during V-V ECMO. A retrospective analysis spanning 2013-2021 at a German university hospital was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!