AI Article Synopsis

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows potential in improving symptoms of ADHD, with notable effects on cognitive deficits and clinical symptoms like impulsivity and inattention in several studies.
  • Safety assessments reveal no serious adverse effects across 747 tDCS sessions, with 2 mA intensity being particularly effective in adults while showing significant results in children even with a lower intensity of 1 mA.
  • Although results are promising, the systematic review highlights the need for more comprehensive studies with larger sample sizes to fully evaluate tDCS's clinical usefulness for ADHD.

Article Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising method for altering cortical excitability with clinical implications. It has been increasingly used in neurodevelopmental disorders, especially attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but its efficacy (based on effect size calculations), safety, and stimulation parameters have not been systematically examined. In this systematic review, we aimed to (1) explore the effectiveness of tDCS on the clinical symptoms and neuropsychological deficits of ADHD patients, (2) evaluate the safety of tDCS application, especially in children with ADHD, (3) model the electrical field intensity in the target regions based on the commonly-applied and effective versus less-effective protocols, and (4) discuss and propose advanced tDCS parameters. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, a literature search identified 14 empirical experiments investigating tDCS effects in ADHD. Partial improving effects of tDCS on cognitive deficits (response inhibition, working memory, attention, and cognitive flexibility) or clinical symptoms (e.g., impulsivity and inattention) are reported in 10 studies. No serious adverse effects are reported in 747 sessions of tDCS. The left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are the regions most often targeted, and anodal tDCS the protocol most often applied. An intensity of 2 mA induced stronger electrical fields than 1 mA in adults with ADHD and was associated with significant behavioral changes. In ADHD children, however, the electrical field induced by 1 mA, which is likely larger than the electrical field induced by 1 mA in adults due to the smaller head size of children, was sufficient to result in significant behavioral change. Overall, tDCS seems to be a promising method for improving ADHD deficits. However, the clinical utility of tDCS in ADHD cannot yet be concluded and requires further systematic investigation in larger sample sizes. Cortical regions involved in ADHD pathophysiology, stimulation parameters (e.g. intensity, duration, polarity, and electrode size), and types of symptom/deficit are potential determinants of tDCS efficacy in ADHD. Developmental aspects of tDCS in childhood ADHD should be considered as well.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532240PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00501-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrical field
16
adhd
12
tdcs
12
transcranial direct
8
direct current
8
current stimulation
8
systematic review
8
tdcs promising
8
promising method
8
stimulation parameters
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!